SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:579-583 (1982)
© 1982 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Amer, F.
Right arrow Articles by Diab, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Amer, F.
Right arrow Articles by Diab, G. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Amer, F.
Right arrow Articles by Diab, G. S.

Agronomic Effectiveness of Pyrophosphate as an Additive to Monocalcium Phosphate and Diammonium Phosphate in Calcareous Soils1

Fathi Amer, M. A. Khalil and G. S. Diab2

ABSTRACT

Recovery of phosphorus (P) from monocalcium phosphate (MCP) and from diammonium phosphate (DAP), in the presence and the absence of sodium pyrophosphate (NaPP), was determined in the greenhouse on two calcareous soils which had been cropped successively with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), corn (Zea mays L.), and clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.). Addition of NaPP to MCP at a pyro-P/ortho-P ratio of 1:49 or 5:45 markedly increased wheat grain yield on the desert soil (39% CaCO3), and responses to 50 ppm P with additive were not statistically different from those to 100 ppm P without additive. Sodium pyrophosphate tended to increase P recovery from MCP by the wheat and by the following corn on the alluvial soil (4.1% CaCO3), and only by the wheat on the desert soil. By the end of the cropping experiments total P recovery was considerably lower on the desert than on the alluvial soil, especially with DAP. The highest recoveries were obtained with the additive treatments. At the rate of 50 ppm P, total recovery from MCP increased with 1 ppm additive from 48.1 to 55.4% on the desert soil and from 57.5 to 71.6% on the alluvial soil. With DAP, the beneficial effect of the additive was not significant at the 0.05 level. In soil columns, addition of NaPP enhanced mobility of MCP to a greater extent than that of DAP. The results suggest that DAP may not be recommended for soils high in CaCO3 content.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Fertilizer Efficiency Project, Soil & Water Science Dep., Univ. of Alexandria, Egypt. The project is supported in part by the Int. Dev. Res. Center, Canada.

2 Professor, Univ. of Alexandria; Senior Soil Specialist, Salinity Lab., Ministry of Agriculture; and Assistant Professor, Univ. of Alexandria, respectively.

Received for publication September 22, 1981. Accepted for publication January 5, 1982.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Soil Science Society of America.