SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:685-688 (1982)
© 1982 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, R. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bradford, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, R. B.

In-situ Measurement of Near-surface Soil Strength by the Fall-cone Device1

J. M. Bradford and R. B. Grossman2

ABSTRACT

This study explored the use of the Swedish fall-cone device for insitu measurements of shear strength near the surface of soils. A laboratory fall-cone device was adapted for field use by replacing the original base and lengthening the cone stems. In-situ strengths were measured on selected soils in southwestern Iowa and southeastern Nebraska. A small increase in water potential resulted in a large decrease in shear strength. A heavier cone gave a lower strength value than a lighter cone. The near-surface strength of Sharpsburg soils in winter wheat fields was measured throughout the year. The strength immediately after fall planting was 10 to 20 kPa at about –3 kPa water potential. In the spring of 1980, largely because of consolidation from rainfall in the immediate post-thaw period, the strength was 30 to 50 kPa. In contrast, the spring of 1981 was dry and consolidation did not occur; consequently, there was no increase in strength from that immediately after planting.


NOTES

1 Contribution from USDA-ARS and USDA-SCS in cooperation with the Purdue Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal Paper no. 8532.

2 Soil Scientist, USDA-ARS, National Soil Erosion Laboratory, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907; and Research Soil Scientist, USDA-SCS, National Soil Survey Laboratory, Lincoln, NE 68501, respectively.

Received for publication November 16, 1981. Accepted for publication April 12, 1982.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Rachman, S. H. Anderson, C. J. Gantzer, and A. L. Thompson
Influence of Long-term Cropping Systems on Soil Physical Properties Related to Soil Erodibility
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2003; 67(2): 637 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Soil Science Society of America.