SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 46:1239-1244 (1982)
© 1982 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKeague, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Topp, G. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McKeague, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Topp, G. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McKeague, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Topp, G. C.

Estimating Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity from Soil Morphology1

J. A. McKeague, C. Wang and G. C. Topp2

ABSTRACT

Guidelines were developed for estimating the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) class of soil horizons from observations of soil morphology by checking estimates against Ksat values measured in the field by an air entry permeameter. For 78 soil horizons ranging in texture from sand to clay, the estimated Ksat class (of eight classes) was the same as the measured class for 45% and within one class of the measured class for 87% of the horizons. Some horizons fell into each of the classes defined, from H1 (>50 cm/h) to L3 (<0.017 cm/h). The major factors contributing to high Ksat values were abundant biopores, textures coarser than loamy fine sand, and strong, fine to medium blocky structure. The lowest values were associated with clayey horizons that had been compressed or puddled by cultivation. Useful estimates of Ksat can be made during soil survey by careful observations of morphology and frequent checks of estimates against measured values.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Land Resource Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, no. 82-19.

2 Research Scientists.

Received for publication April 1, 1982. Accepted for publication July 27, 1982.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
A. Lilly, A. Nemes, W. J. Rawls, and Ya. A. Pachepsky
Probabilistic Approach to the Identification of Input Variables to Estimate Hydraulic Conductivity
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 16 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J.N. Shaw, L.T. West, D.E. Radcliffe, and D.D. Bosch
Preferential Flow and Pedotransfer Functions for Transport Properties in Sandy Kandiudults
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2000; 64(2): 670 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H.S. Lin, K.J. McInnes, L.P. Wilding, and C.T. Hallmark
Effects of Soil Morphology on Hydraulic Properties: I. Quantification of Soil Morphology
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 1999; 63(4): 948 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1982 by the Soil Science Society of America.