SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:25-32 (1983)
© 1983 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Horton, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Horton, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Horton, R.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, D. R.

Evaluation of Methods for Determining the Apparent Thermal Diffusivity of Soil Near the Surface1

R. Horton, P. J. Wierenga and D. R. Nielsen2

ABSTRACT

Field-measured values of soil temperature were used to calculate the apparent thermal diffusivity of the upper 10 cm of soil with six different methods. The limitations of the six methods were analyzed both in terms of the calculated results, and for the quantity and quality of data required to make the calculations. Four of the six methods, Amplitude, Phase, Arctangent, and Logarithm, provided explicit equations for the thermal diffusivity. These explicit methods required only a few measurements of temperature, and calculations were simple to perform; however, the results were found to be erratic and in general inconsistent with known or more reliable estimates of the apparent thermal diffusivity. Two methods, Numerical and Harmonic, which made use of larger numbers of temperature measurements to implicitly solve for the apparent thermal diffusivity, generally provided more reliable estimates. Calculated values of the apparent thermal diffusivity by both methods were used in predicting soil temperature for comparison with measured temperature. Even under partly cloudy conditions both methods predicted temperatures very well. In general the data requirement of the Numerical method was 12 to 24 measures of temperature per day at three depths, while the Harmonic method only required 8 to 12 measures of temperature per day at two depths.


NOTES

1 Journal article no. 916, Agric. Exp. Stn., New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003.

2 Former Graduate Student, now Assistant Professor, Dep. of Agronomy, Iowa State Univ.; Professor, Crop and Soil Science Dep., New Mexico State Univ.; Professor, Land, Air and Water Resources Dep., University of California, Davis (formerly on leave at Las Cruces).

Received for publication December 27, 1981. Accepted for publication August 5, 1982.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1983 by the Soil Science Society of America.