SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:478-483 (1983)
© 1983 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerstl, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yaron, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gerstl, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yaron, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gerstl, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Yaron, B.

Behavior of Bromacil and Napropamide in Soils: II. Distribution After Application from a Point Source1

Z. Gerstl and B. Yaron2

ABSTRACT

The distribution of napropamide [2-({alpha}-naphthoxy)-N,N-diethylpropionamide] and bromacil (5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil) when applied from a point source was determined in several soils. The parameters studied were application rate (4 and 1.5 L/h) and the effect of wetting and drying cycles. In general, napropamide, which was moderately adsorbed by the soils, was concentrated around the emitter; at a high application rate the compound moved laterally more than vertically and at a lower application rate it penetrated to a greater depth. After several cycles of wetting and drying, napropamide was partially leached out of the emitter zone into the soil volume, the amount of leaching being related to the soil texture. Bromacil, which was weakly adsorbed by the soils, was more uniformly distributed in the soil but did exhibit slight retardation in the heavier soils. The effect of application rate was similar to that observed for napropamide; however, after several cycles of wetting and drying, bromacil was completely leached from around the emitter in all soils and was concentrated at the outer edges of the wetted zone.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel, no. 341-E, 1982 series.

2 Soil Scientists, Div. of Soil Residues Chemistry, Inst. of Soils and Water, ARO.

Received for publication January 7, 1983. Accepted for publication January 7, 1983.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1983 by the Soil Science Society of America.