SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:1068-1072 (1983)
© 1983 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scotter, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Clothier, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scotter, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Clothier, B. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Scotter, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Clothier, B. E.

A Transient Method for Measuring Soil Water Diffusivity and Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity1

D. R. Scotter and B. E. Clothier2

ABSTRACT

A method for measuring the unsaturated diffusivity of soil is described. It involves measurement of the matric potential transient at one end of a soil sample following a step change in the potential at the other end. Small potential steps can be used in contrast with the analogous outflow methods, because the difficult task of accurately measuring small flow rates is obviated. The analysis used to obtain the diffusivity from the potential data relies mainly on the delay in the transient and does not depend critically on its shape, thus avoiding the other major problem associated with outflow methods. With the use of the graphs provided, data analysis is simple. Measurement of the total outflow induced by each potential step allows the hydraulic conductivity to be calculated from the diffusivity. Measurements made on repacked soil during desorption and sorption showed no hysteresis in the hydraulic conductivity vs. water content relationship and agreed with independent measurements using a steady-state method. Data for field soil cores are also presented. Differences in shape between the predicted and observed matric potential transients are discussed in terms of entrapped air.

NOTES

1 Contribution from Soil Science Dep., Massey Univ. and Plant Physiology Div., DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

2 Senior Lecturer, Massey University, and Scientist, DSIR, respectively.

Received for publication February 7, 1983. Accepted for publication June 16, 1983.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education		 Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1983 by the Soil Science Society of America.