SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:16-25 (1984)
© 1984 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bresler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Laufer, A.

Statistical Analysis of Salinity and Texture Effects on Spatial Variability of Soil Hydraulic Conductivity1

Eshel Bresler, G. Dagan, R. J. Wagenet and A. Laufer2

ABSTRACT

A statistical analysis that identifies the dominant factors responsible for the spatial variability of the saturated conductivity (Ks) in a selected field is presented. The variables are considered random functions of the space coordinates. Two types of stationarity are investigated: constant mean and stationary variogram (stationarity of order 2) and trend of the means (nonstationarity of the mathematical expectation) with stationary covariances. Linear models of statistical dependence were used. Elimination of factors of minor importance was based on correlation analysis. Electrical conductivity (EC) and percent sand were the most important independent variables, whereas Ks was the dependent variable. The analysis showed that soil salinity (EC) accounted for only 10 to 15% of the variability of Ks texture (percent sand) explained 25 to 45% of the Ks variability, and 10 to 15% of the variability was explained by the interaction between salinity and texture. Various soil factors other than salinity and texture accounted for 30 to 50% of the variability in Ks. Semivariograms and covariograms of Ks, EC, and percent sand did not have a sill because of a significant horizontal linear trend. Calculations showed that the trend accounted for about a half of the variability of the original data. Semivariograms and covariograms of a new population of residuals after extracting the trend gave values of the sills equal to the variances. The integral scale of the residuals of Ks and percent sand was estimated to be about 15 to 20 m, whereas salinity (EC) did not display a spatial structure. The results can be generalized for other studies with different values of variances and covariances of soil salinity and soil texture.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), the Volcani Center, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan, Israel.

2 Soil Physicist, Div. of Soil Physics, ARO, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel; Hydrologist, Div. of Soil Physics, ARO and Professor, Tel Aviv Univ.; Associate Professor, Dep. of Agronomy, Cornell Univ. and Technician, Div. of Soil Physics, ARO, Israel, respectively.

Received for publication March 21, 1983. Accepted for publication August 2, 1983.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1984 by the Soil Science Society of America.