SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:288-291 (1984)
© 1984 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Corwin, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rhoades, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Corwin, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rhoades, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Corwin, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rhoades, J. D.

Measurement of Inverted Electrical Conductivity Profiles Using Electromagnetic Induction1

D. L. Corwin and J. D. Rhoades2

ABSTRACT

Due to sharp discrepancies in the relative response of the horizontal and vertical coil configurations of the Geonics Limited EM-38 electromagnetic induction soil conductivity meter for the top 15 cm of soil, the accuracy of measurement of bulk electrical conductivity for soil having a high surface electrical conductivity relative to deeper depths (i.e., an inverted electrical conductivity profile) has been unreliable. Two new approaches have been developed to compensate for these discrepancies, either through compensations in the vertical coil configuration response curve or the reestablishment of EM0,H adjustment curves utilizing data solely from inverted conductivity profiles. Both approaches yield more consistently reliable calculated bulk soil electrical conductivities when compared to measured electrical conductivities using the four-electrode probe. The latter approach, however, appears to be more accurate.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the U.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 4500 Glenwood Drive Riverside, CA 92501.

2 Soil Scientist and Supervisory Soil Scientist, respectively.

Received for publication March 21, 1983. Accepted for publication November 14, 1983.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. M. H. Hendrickx, B. Borchers, D. L. Corwin, S. M. Lesch, A. C. Hilgendorf, and J. Schlue
Inversion of Soil Conductivity Profiles from Electromagnetic Induction Measurements: Theory and Experimental Verification
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2002; 66(3): 673 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. Triantafilis, G.M. Laslett, and A.B. McBratney
Calibrating an Electromagnetic Induction Instrument to Measure Salinity in Soil under Irrigated Cotton
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2000; 64(3): 1009 - 1017.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1984 by the Soil Science Society of America.