SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1044-1050 (1984)
© 1984 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fitch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fitch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, F. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fitch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Stevenson, F. J.

Comparison of Models for Determining Stability Constants of Metal Complexes with Humic Substances1

Alanah Fitch and F. J. Stevenson2

ABSTRACT

Several recent approaches for determining apparent stability constants of metal complexes with humic and fulvic acids are shown to represent graphical modifications of the basic equation relating the formation function of binding (v = sites bound/macromolecule concentration) to stability constants for the system v = {Sigma}njKj(M)/{Sigma}[1 + Kj (M)], where Kj is the stability constant for binding at class j, nj is the number of binding sites of class j, and (M) is the free metal ion concentration. They include the Scatchard [v/(M) vs. v], reciprocal [1/v vs. (M)], and double reciprocal [1/v vs. 1/(M)] plots. Another approach is shown to have the same form as the Hill plot, which is based on an assumption of positive cooperativity. Comparison of the various models using a common set of experimental data revealed that approaches based on an assumption of linearity yield poor estimates for stability constants. Of the various models, the Hill plot is the least reliable.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, and the Illinois Agric. Exp. Stn. (Project 15-339).

2 Research Assistant and Professor of Soil Chemistry, respectively. The senior author is now Research Associate, Dep. of Chemistry, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison.

Received for publication June 20, 1983. Accepted for publication May 7, 1984.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1984 by the Soil Science Society of America.