SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1125-1129 (1984)
© 1984 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Busacca, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Busacca, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, M. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Busacca, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, M. J.

Dispersion of Soils by an Ultrasonic Method that Eliminates Probe Contact1

A. J. Busacca, J. R. Aniku and M. J. Singer2

ABSTRACT

A cup-type ultrasonic vibrator was evaluated for use in dispersing soils and was calibrated to the standard chemical dispersion plus shaking method. The "cup horn" device isolates the soil suspension from contact with, and potential contamination from, the Ti alloy of the ultrasonic probe-tip or "horn." Five soils (2 A horizons and 3 B horizons) representing four soil orders were tested. The soils varied in texture (16–48% clay), clay mineralogy (mixed to kaolinitic), pH (4.9–7.0), and free-iron (1.9–5.0%). Twenty-minute cup horn treatment at 200 watts yielded clay contents that were 0 to 9.5% lower than those from the standard method; 25-minute treatment yielded values 1.5% lower to 21.5% higher than the standard method. Medium and coarse sand fractions in the soils were lower, and very fine sand and silt fractions tended to be higher after cup horn treatment than after the standard treatment. In a second test, approximately 11% (absolute) of sand samples (50–250, 250–2000 µm), and 6% (absolute) of coarse-silt samples (20–50 µm) shifted to finer fractions after cup horn treatments. Part of this shift was the result of grain abrasion and part was the result of removal of coatings on grains left intact by the standard dispersion treatment. Four of the five soils formed stable dispersions when sonicated in pH 9.5 Na2CO3 solution. The fifth, a very strongly acid soil, flocculated unless titrated to pH 8.5 to 9.5 using 0.1M NaOH after ultrasonic treatment. Coefficients of variation of replicated sand, silt, and clay determinations after cup horn treatment ranged from < 1 to 4%; coefficients of variation of replicated determinations after the standard treatment ranged from 2 to 5%.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Land, Air, and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.

2 Assistant Professor, Dep. of Agronomy and Soils, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164 (formerly Research Assistant, Davis, CA); Research Assistant, and Associate Professor, Davis, CA.

Received for publication May 9, 1983. Accepted for publication February 22, 1984.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1984 by the Soil Science Society of America.