SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:970-973 (1984)
© 1984 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahuja, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ahuja, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, D. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ahuja, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, D. R.

Scaling Soil Water Properties and Infiltration Modeling1

L. R. Ahuja, J. W. Naney and D. R. Nielsen2

ABSTRACT

We examined variability and interrelation of the scaling factors for Green-Ampt infiltration parameters of saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and wetting-front pressure head (hf) in a 9.6-ha grassland watershed, containing three hydrologically similar silt loam Mollisols. Scaling factors for different depths at a given site appeared to be related. The scaled mean Ks decreased with depth, while the scale mean hf showed no trend. The Ks scaling factors had greater variability between sites than the hf factors, and the relationship between the two sets of factors deviated appreciably from a 1:1 line. However, there was a linear relationship between them, which was utilized in modeling infiltration. The composite infiltration for the watershed calculated by using different, but related, scaling factors for Ks and hf was very close to that obtained by using the same scaling factors, derived from either Ks or hf, for both. However, the distribution and range of the predicted infiltrations were greatly different.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Water Quality and Watershed Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Durant, OK 74702, and Dep. of Land, Air, and Water Resources, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616.

2 Soil Scientist (Physics), Geologist, and Professor of Soil and Water Sciences, respectively.

Received for publication February 17, 1984. Accepted for publication April 30, 1984.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
S. Assouline
Modeling the Relationship between Soil Bulk Density and the Hydraulic Conductivity Function
Vadose Zone J., May 26, 2006; 5(2): 697 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1984 by the Soil Science Society of America.