SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:12-19 (1985)
© 1985 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rehfeldt, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rehfeldt, K. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rehfeldt, K. R.

Evaluation of Closed-Form Analytical Models to Calculate Conductivity in a Fine Sand1

Daniel B. Stephens and Kenneth R. Rehfeldt2

ABSTRACT

The soil-water characteristic curve, {theta}{psi}, was determined for an undisturbed core of fine sand over a range of negative pressure heads observed in the field, 0 to 150 cm, below about the 30 cm depth. These data were used to predict relative hydraulic conductivity in a computer code of closed-form analytical solutions developed by van Genuchten for the theoretical models of Burdine and Mualem. The equations to predict conductivity are based upon two parameters fit to observed {theta}{psi} data by a non-linear least squares procedure. The two parameters are influenced by the choice of residual water content, {theta}r, and unsaturated water content, {theta}s. If {theta}r is unknown, it is estimated in the program from observed data. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the reliability of the models. For this soil, calculated conductivities appear to be sensitive to {theta}r. If {theta}{psi} data are available over only a limited range, or if {theta}s is too large, model-predicted {theta}r-values may be near zero, whereas {theta} at large {psi} may actually be about 0.06 to 0.08 cm3/cm3. Predicted conductivities may differ by more than one order of magnitude at about {psi} = 150 cm, depending on the choice of {theta}r.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Department of Geoscience and Research Division, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801. This research was funded in large part by the U.S. Bureau of Mines through the University of Nevada, Reno, under federal grant no. G11151132 UNIV NEV.

2 Associate Professor of Hydrology, and Former Graduate Research Associate, respectively, New Mexico Institute of Mining & Technology, Socorro, NM 87801.

Received for publication January 3, 1984. Accepted for publication August 1, 1984.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H. P. Cresswell, T. W. Green, and N. J. McKenzie
The Adequacy of Pressure Plate Apparatus for Determining Soil Water Retention
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 11, 2008; 72(1): 41 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
L. Prunty and F. X. M. Casey
Soil Water Retention Curve Description Using a Flexible Smooth Function
Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2002; 1(1): 179 - 185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F. J. Kastanek and D. R. Nielsen
Description of Soil Water Characteristics Using Cubic Spline Interpolation
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2001; 65(2): 279 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1985 by the Soil Science Society of America.