SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:394-401 (1985)
© 1985 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edmonds, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lentner, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edmonds, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lentner, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Edmonds, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lentner, M.

Taxonomic Variation within Three Soil Mapping Units in Virginia1

W. J. Edmonds, J. B. Campbell and M. Lentner2

ABSTRACT

This study examines the taxonomic variation of mapping units in second-order soil surveys and evaluates (i) taxa in Soil Taxonomy as designators of mapping unit content, (ii) phenetic similarity of soil profiles, and (iii) soil characters as class differentiae. Taxonomic purity was not attained within 7 m at any categorical level in Soil Taxonomy and four orders were necessary for objectively designating the pedologic content of a mapping unit. Comparisons of groupings of soil profiles by Soil Taxonomy and clusters defined by phenetic similarity revealed that phenetically similar soil profiles were placed in different taxa and phenetically different soil profiles were combined in the same taxon. Any given soil character was not considered to be accessory to any other character because of low covariance. No single character could be identified as an effective differentia when evaluated in light of its loading onto the eigenvectors. Numerical methods for generalizing the data encountered in these mapping units are illustrated.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Dep. of Agronomy, Geography, and Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ., Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.

2 Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor, respectively, Virginia Polytechnic Inst. & State Univ.

Received for publication February 9, 1984. Accepted for publication November 13, 1984.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F. M. Ziadat
Analyzing Digital Terrain Attributes to Predict Soil Attributes for a Relatively Large Area
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 25, 2005; 69(5): 1590 - 1599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
F.J. Young and R.D. Hammer
Defining Geographic Soil Bodies by Landscape Position, Soil Taxonomy, and Cluster Analysis
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2000; 64(3): 989 - 998.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1985 by the Soil Science Society of America.