HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Childs, S. W. Articles by Miller, E. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Childs, S. W. Articles by Miller, E. L. Agricola Articles by Childs, S. W. Articles by Miller, E. L.

Shadecard and Shelterwood Modification of the Soil Temperature Environment¹

ABSTRACT

A study was conducted on steep, south-facing slopes in southwest Oregon to assess the effect of two common reforestation practices on the soil thermal environment. Three clearcut sites and three shelterwood sites were instrumented to measure soil temperature at five depths in the vicinity of shaded and unshaded Douglas-fir seedlings. Since the soils studied were skeletal, heat capacities of both fine and coarse soil fractions were determined for each site. These data were used to estimate soil heat fluxes. Shelterwoods decrease soil temperatures approximately 6 K when compared with clearcuts. This result holds at both 20- and 320-mm depths. Shelterwoods also decrease the depth of diurnal heating and decrease maximum hourly heat loss and gain values by 73 and 80 W/m², respectively. Shadecards, cardboard rectangles placed to the southwest of seedlings, generally have little effect on the soil temperature regime of skeletal soils but are effective in reducing daily heat flux. The dominant shadecard effect is a decrease in average daytime heat flux by 22 W/m², but shadecards also decrease average nighttime fluxes. Shelterwoods ameliorate seasonal soil temperature conditions significantly and may be an appropriate technique in situations where cumulative soil heating limits reforestation success. Shadecards should be useful in situations where heat stress events of only a few days are a problem. Over a season, shadecards exert little control, and their influence on stress is limited. Since all soils studied had high heat capacities due to large rock fragment content the conclusions of this study may be limited to soils with large soil heat capacity.

¹ Oregon Agric. Exp. Stn. Technical Paper no. 6948. Contribution of the Dep. of Soil Science and Dep. of Forest Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis. This work was supported as part of the Forestry Intensified Research Program (PNW-80-85), a cooperative project of Oregon State Univ., the USDA Forest Service, and the USDI Bureau of Land Management.

² Assistant Professor, Dep. of Soil Science; Assistant Professor and Research Associate, Dep. of Forest Engineering; Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR 97331.

Received for publication September 19, 1983. Accepted for publication January 15, 1985.