SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:957-961 (1985)
© 1985 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edmonds, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Edmonds, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, T. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Edmonds, W. J.
Right arrow Articles by Simpson, T. W.

Variance and Scale Influences on Classifying and Interpreting Soil Map Units1

W. J. Edmonds, J. C. Baker and T. W. Simpson2

ABSTRACT

Residual variance including the variance contributed by sampling and laboratory procedures, by soil profiles within circular 7-m diam sites, by sites within delineated soil bodies, and by delineated soil bodies within each of three second-order soil survey map units were evaluated using a nested sampling design. Residual variances were small for base saturation, clay, and free iron and large for pH, quartz in the sand fraction, kaolinite, and gibbsite in the clay fraction, and the oxidic ratio. Naming and interpreting map units using classes based on the dissection of variable with large residual variances will be confounded by the sampling and laboratory procedures. Distributions of variance for the soil properties studied revealed that mutually-exclusive classes were not delineated by these map units. Shortrange variability in field observable soil properties was not mapped because of the constraint of scale. Therefore, users of soil survey information would be better served by procedures for naming and interpreting map units that describe the content and pattern of occurrence of soils rather than relying on classificational units or soil series defined by limits of taxa in Soil Taxonomy to convey map unit content and interpretations.


NOTES

1 Contribution of the Dep. of Agronomy, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061.

2 Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Assistant Professor, respectively.

Received for publication May 19, 1983. Accepted for publication March 20, 1985.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M.H. Stolt, M.H. Genthner, W.L. Daniels, and V.A. Groover
Spatial Variability in Palustrine Wetlands
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2001; 65(2): 527 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
P.J. Thomas, J.C. Baker, L.W. Zelazny, and D.R. Hatch
Relationship of Map Unit Variability to Shrink-Swell Indicators
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2000; 64(1): 262 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Soil Science Society of America.