HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stone, J. R. Articles by Kleiss, H. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stone, J. R. Articles by Kleiss, H. J. Agricola Articles by Stone, J. R. Articles by Kleiss, H. J.

Effect of Erosion and Landscape Position on the Productivity of Piedmont Soils¹

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine the effect of past accelerated erosion in the North Carolina Piedmont on soil physical and chemical properties and soil productivity, and to determine the relationship between soil productivity, soil erosion, and landscape position. Data from five Piedmont fields were collected over a 2-yr period. Within each field, plots were located on all erosion classes and landscape positions present. Definite relationships between erosion class and soil physical and chemical properties were observed. Clay content increased approximately 10% for each erosion class change from slight to moderate to severe. Organic matter content tended to be higher on the more eroded sites. Differences in topsoil depth among erosion classes in a given field ranged from 2.4 to 8.7 cm and the severely eroded areas were always significantly shallower. Available water-holding capacity of the A horizon (g g^–1) always was slightly higher on the more eroded sites. Available P decreased sharply with erosion severity but all sites had levels 17 g P m^–3 which is considered adequate. The highest corn grain yields were usually obtained on the moderately eroded sites as compared to the slightly and severely eroded areas. This was particularly true in 1981 which was a dry year. In a more favorable year (1982) with regard to amount and distribution of growing season rainfall, the yield differences among erosion classes were less. The differences in corn grain yield among landscape positions were much more consistent than yield differences among erosion classes. Those landscape positions that received water from higher elevations produced the highest yields. Because landscape position and erosion severity are not mutually exclusive, we believe that much of the published data dealing with the effects of erosion on soil productivity are confounded by the effect of landscape positions on soil erosion.

¹ Contribution from the Dep. of Soil Science, North Carolina State Univ. 27695-7619. Paper no. 9172 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service, Raleigh, NC 27695-7601.

² Former Research Associate, Professor of Soil Science, Professor of Soil Science, Professor of Soil Science, Professor of Statistics, and Associate Professor of Soil Science, respectively, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7619.

Received for publication March 12, 1984. Accepted for publication January 28, 1985.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Iqbal, J. J. Read, A. J. Thomasson, and J. N. Jenkins Relationships between Soil-Landscape and Dryland Cotton Lint Yield Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 6, 2005; 69(3): 872 - 882. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Heckrath, J. Djurhuus, T. A. Quine, K. Van Oost, G. Govers, and Y. Zhang Tillage Erosion and Its Effect on Soil Properties and Crop Yield in Denmark J. Environ. Qual., January 1, 2005; 34(1): 312 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Jiang and K. D. Thelen Effect of Soil and Topographic Properties on Crop Yield in a North-Central Corn-Soybean Cropping System Agron. J., January 1, 2004; 96(1): 252 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. K. Cassel, M. M. Afyuni, and W. P. Robarge Manganese Distribution and Patterns of Soil Wetting and Depletion in a Piedmont Hillslope Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2002; 66(3): 939 - 947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Li, R. J. Lascano, J. Booker, L. T. Wilson, K. F. Bronson, and E. Segarra State-Space Description of Field Heterogeneity: Water and Nitrogen Use in Cotton Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2002; 66(2): 585 - 595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Pennock, F. Walley, M. Solohub, B. Si, and G. Hnatowich Topographically Controlled Yield Response of Canola to Nitrogen Fertilizer Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2001; 65(6): 1838 - 1845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Van Oost, G. Govers, W. Van Muysen, and T.A. Quine Modeling Translocation and Dispersion of Soil Constituents by Tillage on Sloping Land Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2000; 64(5): 1733 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				A. N. Kravchenko and D. G. Bullock Correlation of Corn and Soybean Grain Yield with Topography and Soil Properties Agron. J., January 1, 2000; 92(1): 75 - 83. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				G.L. Olson and D.K. Cassel Bromide Leaching on a Piedmont Toposequence Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1319 - 1326. [Abstract] [Full Text]