SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1093-1099 (1985)
© 1985 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Grinsven, J. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bouten, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Grinsven, J. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bouten, W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by van Grinsven, J. J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bouten, W.

Evaluation of the Hot Air Method for Measuring Soil Water Diffusivity1

J. J. M. van Grinsven, C. Dirksen and W. Bouten2

ABSTRACT

The Hot Air Method (HAM) is a fairly new and simple method for measuring soil water diffusivity. However, with the introduction of temperatures much higher than originally proposed by Arya et al. (1975), the validity of the underlying assumptions must be questioned. Philip's iterative solution was adapted for desorption out of a semi-infinite column at constant surface water content to evaluate effects of soil type and boundary water contents on the experimental results. Errors due to deviations from assumed isothermal conditions were evaluated with the Philip and de Vries (1957) theory for the large temperature increases that occur in soil columns during execution of HAM. Evaporation losses and water redistribution during sampling of the soil column were evaluated by simulation. Error analysis indicates that, with the present usage of air temperatures up to 250°C and sampling times of several minutes, HAM does not satisfy the prerequisite assumptions. Reports of favorable results from HAM are probably due to mutual compensation of different errors and to considerable smoothing of experimental results. In spite of its great experimental advantages one should be dissuaded from using HAM unless the experimental errors are minimized and the calculation technique is made objective and reproducible. In this paper some improvements for the experimental procedure are proposed.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Dep. of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Agricultural Univ., 6703 BC De Dreijen 3, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

2 Soil Scientist (presently working for the Dep. of Soil Science and Geology), Soil Scientist, Soil Scientist from Lab. of Physical Geography and Soil Science, Univ. of Amsterdam, respectively.

Received for publication January 3, 1984. Accepted for publication March 22, 1985.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. S. Tyner, L. M. Arya, and W. C. Wright
The Dual Gravimetric Hot-Air Method for Measuring Soil Water Diffusivity
Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2006; 5(4): 1281 - 1286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1985 by the Soil Science Society of America.