SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:4-9 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hopmans, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dane, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hopmans, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dane, J. H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hopmans, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dane, J. H.

Temperature Dependence of Soil Hydraulic Properties1

J. W. Hopmans and J. H. Dane2

ABSTRACT

The study of soil water movement under nonisothermal conditions requires knowledge of the hydraulic properties as a function of temperature. A dual-energy gamma system was used to investigate temperature effects on the water retention curve and the hydraulic conductivity function of a Norfolk sandy loam soil (Typic Paleudults). These hydraulic properties were determined from simultaneous measurements of soil water pressure head, volumetric water content, and soil temperature at 13 measurement points along a lucite flow cell during transient drainage conditions while maintaining a temperature gradient. It was concluded that temperature influences water retention more than can be explained by surface tension changes of pure water only. Entrapped air was not considered to be the primary cause of the larger temperature effect. The influence of temperature on measured hydraulic conductivities was close to predictions from viscosity changes for most of the measurement points. Deviations from predicted hydraulic conductivity values were attributed to thermal vapor flow. Temperature had little or no effect when the hydraulic conductivity was plotted vs. soil water pressure head.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Ala. Agric. Exp. Stn, Auburn Univ., AL 36849. AAES Journal no. 3-85824.

2 Graduate Research Assistant and Associate Professor of Soil Physics, respectively. Dep. of Agronomy and Soils, Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn Univ., AL 36849.

Received for publication July 12, 1985. Accepted for publication September 12, 1985.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. Lin, D. Greenwald, and A. Banin
Temperature dependence of infiltration rate during large scale water recharge into soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2003; 67(2): 487 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. Bachmann, R. Horton, S. A. Grant, and R. R. van der Ploeg
Temperature Dependence of Water Retention Curves for Wettable and Water-Repellent Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 44 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.