SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:80-86 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fillery, I. R. P.
Right arrow Articles by De Datta, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fillery, I. R. P.
Right arrow Articles by De Datta, S. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fillery, I. R. P.
Right arrow Articles by De Datta, S. K.

Ammonia Volatilization from Nitrogen Sources Applied to Rice Fields: I. Methodology, Ammonia Fluxes, and Nitrogen-15 Loss1

I. R. P. Fillery and S. K. De Datta2

ABSTRACT

The extent of NH3 volatilization from (NH4)2SO4, urea, and urea amended with the urease inhibitor, phenyl phosphorodiamidate (PPD), was studied concurrently in flooded rice (Oryza sativa L.) by using nondisturbing micrometeorological techniques. Nitrogen-15 balance techniques were used to estimate the total 15N loss and the relative contribution of NH3 volatilization and nitrification-denitrification to the N loss. N sources were applied to the floodwater 18 d after the transplanting of rice seedlings (AT treatments). Ammonia volatilization proceeded rapidly after the application of (NH4)2SO4 and urea, although the pattern of NH3 loss differed between the N sources. Ammonia fluxes accounted for 38 and 36% of the N applied as (NH4)2SO4 or urea, respectively, in an 8-d period. A lower rate of NH3 loss (22% N applied) occurred within the same period from a field amended with urea + PPD (1% wt/wt), primarily because NH3 fluxes were negligible for at least 3 d after urea was applied. The total 15N loss at the termination of the NH3 loss measurements accounted for 44 and 41% of the (NH4)2SO4 and urea N, respectively. A significantly (P less double equals0.05) lower 15N loss (33% N applied) occurred when a nitrification inhibitor (nitrapyrin) was applied with urea. These results suggested that nitrification-denitrification may have contributed slightly to the total N loss from urea. Nitrapyrin did not significantly (P <0.05) affect 15N loss from microplots amended with (NH4)2SO4. A simplified micrometeorological technique that used wind speed and atmospheric NH3 concentrations at a single predetermined height to measure NH3 fluxes accurately estimated fluxes (R2 = 0.99) that were determined by the horizontal flux or mass balance technique. An indirect estimate of NH3 loss based on the rate of 15N loss from nitrapyrin and urea amended microplots (33% N applied) was similar to the total NH3 loss computed with the mass balance micrometeorological technique (36% N applied). This finding confirms the reliability of the mass balance micrometeorological technique used in NH3 loss measurements.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the Agro-Economic Division, International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC), P.O. Box 2040, Muscle Shoals, AL 35662; and the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), P.O. Box 933, Manila, Philippines.

2 Formerly Soil Scientist, IFDC, and Visiting Scientist, Dep. of Soil Chemistry, IRRI; and Head, Dep. of Agronomy, IRRI, respectively. Present address of senior author, Dryland Crops and Soils Research Programme, CSIRO, Private Bag PO, Wembley, WA 6014, Australia.

Received for publication July 11, 1984. Accepted for publication August 9, 1985.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.