SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:326-331 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (118)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnitzer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Preston, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schnitzer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Preston, C. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schnitzer, M.
Right arrow Articles by Preston, C. M.

Analysis of Humic Acids by Solution and Solid-state Carbon-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance1

M. Schnitzer and C. M. Preston2

ABSTRACT

Eighteen humic acids (HA's) were characterized by chemical analyses, infrared (IR) and electron spin resonance spectra, and by solution and solid-state cross polarization magic-angle spinning (CPMAS) 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The main objectives of this investigation were: (i) to compare the solution and solid-state 13C NMR spectra of the HA's; (ii) to examine effects of different delay times (D1) on the solution spectra; and (iii) to find reasons for the failure of 13C NMR to detect the presence of significant concentrations of phenolic C in unmethylated HA's. Compared to solution spectra, CPMAS spectra consisted of relatively few, broad bands, indicative of considerable overlapping of individual signals, especially in the aliphatic regions. Proportions of aliphatic C determined by solution 13C NMR at D1 = 0.74 s were greater than those obtained at D1 = 1.90 s and by CPMAS 13C NMR (where D1 = relaxation delay). By contrast, proportions of aromatic C and aromaticities were greatest at D1 = 1.90 s. The highest values for CO2H groups were obtained by CPMAS 13C NMR and approached total acidities; values measured by solution 13C NMR at D1 = 1.90 s were intermediate, while those determined by solution 13C NMR with D1 = 0.74 s were the lowest and closest to CO2H concentrations determined chemically. Because the presence in HA's of significant concentrations of phenolic OH groups has been confirmed by several independent methods, it is possible that in 13C NMR spectra of HA's, signals arising from phenolic C are shifted downfield so that they overlap with resonances of C in CO2H groups. The net result is that CO2H groups are overestimated and phenolic OH groups underestimated.


NOTES

1 Contribution no. 1557 from the Chemistry and Biology Research Institute, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada.

2 Program Leader, Soil Nitrogen and Organic Matter, and Research Scientist, Nitrogen Fixation, respectively.

Received for publication June 17, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.