SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:644-648 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duxbury, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McConnaughey, P. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Duxbury, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McConnaughey, P. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Duxbury, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by McConnaughey, P. K.

Effect of Fertilizer Source on Denitrification and Nitrous Oxide Emissions in a Maize-field1

J. M. Duxbury and P. K. McConnaughey2

ABSTRACT

The C2H2-block method was used to measure denitrification in a maize (Zea mays L.) field over the 85-d period between sidedressing with N fertilizer and harvest. Measurement locations were changed weekly in order to avoid problems associated with microbial utilization of C2H2 and inhibition of nitrification. Nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes were measured both with and without C2H2 addition to soil. Without C2H2 addition to soil, 0.3 kg N ha–1 was evolved from both unfertilized and Ca(NO3)2 treated soil, whereas 2.5 kg N ha–1 was evolved from urea treated soil. This difference was attributed to formation of N2O during nitrification of NH+4 liberated from urea. With C2H2 addition to soil, 1.6, 2.0, and 2.4 kg N ha–1 were evolved as the result of denitrification in the zero N, Ca(NO3)2, and urea treated sites, respectively. Total gaseous N loss from a particular N treatment was approximated by adding together the N2O-N loss with and without C2H2 addition to soil. The gaseous N loss associated with fertilizer addition was <3% of that applied. The ratio of N2/N2O evolved without C2H2 addition to soil was estimated to be in the range of 4:1 to 7:1 for the zero N and Ca(NO3)2 treatments and about 1:1 for the urea treatment. Denitrification was responsible for at least 80% of the measured gaseous N loss from the zero N and Ca(NO3)2 treatments. About equal amounts of gaseous N loss from the urea treatment occurred via denitrification and during nitrification of liberated NH+4.


NOTES

1 Cornell Univ., Dep. of Agronomy, paper no. 1561.

2 Associate Professor of Soil Chemistry and former Graduate Student, Dep. of Agronomy, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853, respectively.

Received for publication May 1, 1985.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. A. A. Adviento-Borbe, J. W. Doran, R. A. Drijber, and A. Dobermann
Soil Electrical Conductivity and Water Content Affect Nitrous Oxide and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Intensively Managed Soils
J. Environ. Qual., October 27, 2006; 35(6): 1999 - 2010.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H. R. S. Rozas, H. E. Echeverria, and L. I. Picone
Denitrification in Maize Under No-Tillage: Effect of Nitrogen Rate and Application Time
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2001; 65(4): 1314 - 1323.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
H. S. Rozas, H. E. Echeverría, G. A. Studdert, and G. Domínguez
Evaluation of the Presidedress Soil Nitrogen Test for No-Tillage Maize Fertilized at Planting
Agron. J., November 1, 2000; 92(6): 1176 - 1183.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.