SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:759-764 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davidoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Selim, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davidoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Selim, H. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Davidoff, B.
Right arrow Articles by Selim, H. M.

Goodness of Fit for Eight Water Infiltration Models1

B. Davidoff and H. M. Selim2

ABSTRACT

Eight infiltration models were investigated for their capability to describe water infiltration into soils. The models were; Philip's, Modified Philip's, Kostiakov's, Talsma and Parlange's, Horton's, and Lewis and Milne's. Field measurements of water infiltration were made using single ring infiltrometers on field plots established on a Norwood soil (Typic Udifluvents) with four long-term (27 yr) winter cover crop treatments followed by cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) each year. The four treatments were; (i) common vetch (Vicia sativa), (ii) wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) + 60 kg/ha N; (iii) 60 kg/ha N, and (iv) check (no fertilizer or winter cover). Measured infiltration rates for the winter cover treatments were significantly higher than for the check plots. With the exception of Lewis and Milne's, all models showed good agreement with measured infiltration. Model parameters obtained by best fit of measured data, were significantly different among the winter cover treatments. Based on R2 values, Horton, Kostiakov and Philip equations provided best predictions over all other models. Soil bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity for two soil depths were not affected by the winter cover treatments.


NOTES

1 Contribution from Agronomy Dep., Louisiana Agric. Exp. Stn., Louisiana State Univ. Agric. Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803.

2 Instructor and Professor of Soil Physics, respectively.

Received for publication December 5, 1984.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.