SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:841-848 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hainsworth, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aylmore, L. A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hainsworth, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aylmore, L. A. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hainsworth, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Aylmore, L. A. G.

Water Extraction by Single Plant Roots1

J. M. Hainsworth and L. A. G. Aylmore2

ABSTRACT

Application of computer assisted tomography to x-ray attenuation measurements has been used to study the drawdowns in soil-water content associated with single plant roots. Drawdowns have been measured at different depths along radish (Raphanus sativus cv long scarlet) roots growing in soil at two different initial water contents while the plants were subjected to either a high or low transpirational demand. This novel approach has provided the most detailed observations of this type yet obtained, particularly by a nondestructive technique. Soil resistance to water flow is clearly of significance even at the high soil-water potentials used since it has been observed to markedly influence water uptake. Comparisons between these experimentally determined drawdowns and those predicted by an analytical approach indicate that this model does not adequately describe the extraction process. In particular, the assumption that a plant root acts as a uniform absorbing cylinder along its length is clearly erroneous. While a numerical model gives a closer fit to the experimental data, it is clear that improvements in the physical concepts on which this is based are necessary to accurately describe the position and shape of the drawdowns.


NOTES

1 Contribution from Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, School of Agriculture, Univ. of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009.

2 Research Officer and Associate Professor of Soil Science, respectively.

Received for publication May 23, 1985.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
Q. d. J. van Lier, K. Metselaar, and J. C. van Dam
Root Water Extraction and Limiting Soil Hydraulic Conditions Estimated by Numerical Simulation
Vadose Zone J., November 20, 2006; 5(4): 1264 - 1277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
K. KIKUCHI, M. KOIZUMI, N. ISHIDA, and H. KANO
Water Uptake by Dry Beans Observed by Micro-magnetic Resonance Imaging
Ann. Bot., September 1, 2006; 98(3): 545 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Geological Society, London, Special PublicationsHome page
H. Rogasik, I. Onasch, J. Brunotte, D. Jegou, and O. Wendroth
Assessment of soil structure using X-ray computed tomography
Geological Society, London, Special Publications, January 1, 2003; 215(1): 151 - 165.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
H. Rogasik, J.W. Crawford, O. Wendroth, I.M. Young, M. Joschko, and K. Ritz
Discrimination of Soil Phases by Dual Energy X-ray Tomography
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 1999; 63(4): 741 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.