SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:932-936 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Izaurralde, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Swallow, C. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Izaurralde, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Swallow, C. W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Izaurralde, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Swallow, C. W.

Laboratory Apparatus to Apply and Sample Anhydrous Ammonia in Bands1

R. C. Izaurralde, D. E. Kissel and C. W. Swallow2

ABSTRACT

To describe how soil properties affect anhydrous ammonia (NH3) retention, more accurate laboratory methods are needed to apply anhydrous NH3 in a line source (band) and sample the resulting NH3 retention zone. We developed and tested a line-source NH3 applicator and a method for sampling the resulting NH3 retention zone. The applicator has a system of flow control valves and a flow meter to regulate the rate of NH3 flow to an injection needle. The needle is held stationary while NH3 is injected into a box of soil. The box of soil moves on a platform whose speed can be varied to change the NH3 application rate. The soil sampling method was to sequentially remove concentric cylindrical cores of increasing radii centered around the line of NH3 injection. Ammonia was applied to two soils with different NH3 retention capacities and the resulting NH3 retention zones were sampled. Accurate NH3 deliveries were possible with the system described. The coefficient of variation of the platform speed was <1%. The sampling method gave N recoveries that ranged between 95 to 99%. By using the concentric ring sampling method, ammoniacal-N concentrations of duplicate retention zones at different distances from the injection line were not significantly different. Thus, the applicator and soil sampling method proved to be both accurate and precise for studying NH3 retention zones in soil.


NOTES

1 Contribution no. 86-33-J, Agronomy Dep., Kansas Agric. Exp. Stn., Manhattan, KS 66506. Part of a dissertation submitted by the senior author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree at Kansas State Univ. This study supported in part by grants from the Test and Demonstration Branch of the National Fertilizer Development Center of TVA and Dow Chemical Company.

2 Graduate Research Assistant, Professor, and Associate Professor, respectively, Dep. of Agronomy, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS 66506. Present address of senior author is: Fac. de. C. Agropecuarias, Univ. Nacional de Cordoba, cc 509, 5000 Cordoba, Argentina.

Received for publication August 23, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.