SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1294-1298 (1986)
© 1986 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moore, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Burch, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moore, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Burch, G. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Moore, I. D.
Right arrow Articles by Burch, G. J.

Physical Basis of the Length-slope Factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation1

Ian D. Moore and Gordon J. Burch2

ABSTRACT

The length-slope factor in the universal soil loss equation (USLE) is a purely empirical relationship that was derived from an extensive data base. A physically based length-slope factor was independently derived in this paper by using unit stream power theory to describe the erosion processes associated with sheet and rill flow on hill-slopes. It was shown that the two length-slope factors are equivalent. Therefore, the USLE length-slope factor is a measure of the sediment transport capacity of runoff from the landscape, but fails to fully account for the hydrological processes that affect runoff and erosion. The strength of the theoretically derived length-slope factor is that it explicitly accounts for the dual phenomena of catchment convergence and rilling. The empirically derived factor can not account for changes in either surface flow or erosion processes, nor slope geometry, and this may explain why the values derived for other factors in the USLE, especially soil erodibilities, have been found to be inconsistent.


NOTES

1 Contribution from CSIRO, Canberra, Australia.

2 Both authors are Senior Research Scientists, Div. of Water and Land Resources, CSIRO, G.P.O. Box 1666, Canberra, A.C.T. 2601, Australia.

Received for publication September 10, 1985.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1986 by the Soil Science Society of America.