SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:290-297 (1987)
© 1987 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (63)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGarry, D.
Right arrow Articles by Malafant, K. W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McGarry, D.
Right arrow Articles by Malafant, K. W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McGarry, D.
Right arrow Articles by Malafant, K. W. J.

The Analysis of Volume Change in Unconfined Units of Soil1

D. McGarry and K. W. J. Malafant2

ABSTRACT

The assessment of volume change with associated change in water content has been widely used to assess soil structural quality. The possibility of inter-experiment comparisons has been minimized both by the lack of a theoretically based model for predicting volume change, and the non-standardization of coordinates to define the data. Three models which have been or could be used to describe soil shrinkage curves—the specific volume versus gravimetric water content relationship—are derived; the three straight lines model, the general soil volume change equation and the logistic model. The important parameters of the models are specified and their interpretation with regard to soil properties given. The three models are compared both theoretically and for worked examples, the latter using published data from Austin Clay (U.S.A.), Hanslope Series (U.K.) and a Typic Pellustert (Australia). The three straight lines model not only performs well for the data presented but also provides model parameters which have direct physical interpretation within soil science.


NOTES

1 Contribution from CSIRO. Australia.

2 Research Scientist, CSIRO Division of Soils, Cunningham Laboratory, 306 Carmody Rd., St. Lucia, Qld., 4067, and Experimental Scientist, CSIRO Division of Mathematics and Statistics, G.P.O. Box 1965, Canberra City, A.C.T. 2601, AUSTRALIA (now with Bureau of Mineral Resources, G.P.O. Box 378, Canberra City, A.C.T. 2601, AUSTRALIA), respectively.

Received for publication January 22, 1986.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Soil Science Society of America.