SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:302-304 (1987)
© 1987 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnabel, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Richie, E. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schnabel, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Richie, E. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schnabel, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Richie, E. B.

Elimination of Time Assignment Bias in Estimates of Dispersion Coefficient1

R. R. Schnabel and E. B. Richie2

ABSTRACT

Dispersion coefficients are commonly determined by regressing column effluent data against predictions of transport equations. When column effluent is collected in fractions, measured concentration is an average over the collection interval. A method is presented for estimating dispersion coefficients by regressing column data against the integral of the transport equation. This dispersion coefficient is compared to estimates obtained when effluent concentration is assigned to the end or middle of collection intervals. Dispersion coefficient estimates obtained by regressing effluent concentration against the integral of the transport equation were as much as 80% greater than those obtained by assigning effluent concentration to the end of the collection interval, and within approximately 20% of those obtained by assigning effluent data to the middle of the interval. The amount of difference depended on model variables of collection interval and Peclet number.


NOTES

1 Contribution from the USDA-ARS, in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Agric. Exp. Stn., The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, Pa 16802.

2 Soil Scientist and Hydrologist, USDA-ARS, Northeast Watershed Research Center, University Park, PA 16802.

Received for publication May 16, 1986.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1987 by the Soil Science Society of America.