SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:323-329 (1988)
© 1988 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. A.

Evaluation of Statistical Estimation Methods for Lognormally Distributed Variables

T. B. Parkin*, J. J. Meisinger and J. L. Starr

USDA-ARS, BARC. Soil Nitrogen and Environmental Chemistry Lab., Beltsville, MD 20705

S. T. Chester and J. A. Robinson

The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI 49001

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Distributions of many chemical, physical, and microbiological properties of soils appear to be lognormal. Several conflicting recommendations exist in the soil science and statistical literature on how to best estimate the population mean, variance, and coefficient of variation of lognormally distributed data. We chose to determine with statistical certainty which of the following three methods is best: (i) the method of moments (method 1); (ii) maximum likelihood (method 2); and (iii) Finney's method (method 3). We assessed the efficacy of these three methods for estimating the mean, variance, and coefficient of variation of lognormal data in the range of sample sizes from n = 4 to 100. Three test lognormal populations were used in our evaluation with coefficients of variation that span the range seen for many soil variables (CVs of 50%, 100%, and 200%). We found Finney's method was best for estimating the mean and variance of lognormal data when the coefficient of variation of the underlying lognormal frequency distribution exceeds 100%, below this value the extra computational effort required to implement Finney's technique buys little, relative to the method of moments. Finney's method has not been previously applied by soil scientists, but its superiority over maximum likelihood suggests that the latter should not be generally recommended for estimating the mean, variance and coefficient of variation of lognormal data.


NOTES

Contribution of the USDA-ARS and The Upjohn Company.

Received for publication May 29, 1987.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
T. B. Parkin
Effect of Sampling Frequency on Estimates of Cumulative Nitrous Oxide Emissions
J. Environ. Qual., June 23, 2008; 37(4): 1390 - 1395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. L. Ruffo, G. A. Bollero, R. G. Hoeft, and D. G. Bullock
Spatial Variability of the Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test: Implications for Soil Sampling
Agron. J., October 19, 2005; 97(6): 1485 - 1492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
H. Shahandeh, A. L. Wright, F. M. Hons, and R. J. Lascano
Spatial and Temporal Variation of Soil Nitrogen Parameters Related to Soil Texture and Corn Yield
Agron. J., April 27, 2005; 97(3): 772 - 782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
T. L. Kastens, J. P. Schmidt, and K. C. Dhuyvetter
Yield Models Implied by Traditional Fertilizer Recommendations and a Framework for Including Nontraditional Information
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2003; 67(1): 351 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. P. Schmidt, R. K. Taylor, and G. A. Milliken
Evaluating the Potential for Site-Specific Phosphorus Applications Without High-Density Soil Sampling
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 276 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
S.O. Petersen, K. Kristensen, and J. Eriksen
Denitrification Losses from Outdoor Piglet Production: Spatial and Temporal Variability
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2001; 30(3): 1051 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. Zhang
Generalized Transfer Function Model for Solute Transport in Heterogeneous Soils
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2000; 64(5): 1595 - 1602.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. J. Brejda, T. B. Moorman, J. L. Smith, D. L. Karlen, D. L. Allan, and T. H. Dao
Distribution and Variability of Surface Soil Properties at a Regional Scale
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2000; 64(3): 974 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the Soil Science Society of America.