HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vanden Heuvel, R. M. Articles by Giamalva, J. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Vanden Heuvel, R. M. Articles by Giamalva, J. A. Agricola Articles by Vanden Heuvel, R. M. Articles by Giamalva, J. A.

Comparison of Steam-Distillation Apparati and Glassware Cleaning Procedures for Reduction of Nitrogen-15 Cross-contamination

Department of Agronomy, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Several studies were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of three types of steam-distillation apparati and condensing columns and various acid-bath cleaning procedures for glassware for reduction of cross-contamination errors after contamination with 50 atom percent excess ¹⁵N. Regardless of the procedure used to reduce contamination between samples, a stainless steel apparatus always retained less N than a glass design widely used in N research. However, comparable cross-contamination errors with glass can be achieved by simulating design features that have been recommended for the stainless steel apparatus. The effectiveness of the condensing columns in reducing cross-contamination was in the order: stainless steel > Ag-plated brass > glass where no procedure was performed to reduce cross-contamination. Regardless of the procedure used to reduce contamination, the stainless steel condenser always retained the least amount of N. However, use of a steel condenser in conjunction with a glass steam-distillation head did not reduce cross-contamination errors. Immersion of glassware in 0.01 M HCl for 5 min removed 18 to 80% of residual NH⁺₄-N from contaminated glassware. Longer immersion periods improved contamination errors but did not eliminate residual NH⁺₄-N. Hydrofluoric acid was generally more effective than HCl in removing retained N but offers little advantage during routine N analysis.

This study was a part of Project no. ILLU-15-3670 of the Agric. Exp. Stn., College of Agriculture, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and was supported in part by the TVA.

Received for publication April 23, 1987.