SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 52:1270-1273 (1988)
© 1988 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnabel, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fitting, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schnabel, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fitting, D. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schnabel, R. R.
Right arrow Articles by Fitting, D. J.

Analysis of Chemical Kinetics Data from Dilute, Dispersed, Well-mixed Flow-through Systems

R. R. Schnabel*

USDA-ARS, Northeast Watershed Research Center, University Park, PA 16802

D. J. Fitting

Dep. of Geology, The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Flow-through techniques for studying chemical kinetics in soils are gaining acceptance. Of these techniques, those resulting in dilute, dispersed, well-mixed suspensions minimize the hydrologic control on effluent concentration. The increased understanding of chemical kinetics gained by minimizing hydrologic control can be lost by improper data analysis. The following research was performed to develop a procedure for analyzing the kinetics of chemical retention by soil in a dilute, dispersed well-mixed flow-through system. The results of the research demonstrate that data analysis must account for the mass of unreacted chemical in the reactor. Failure to do so results in systematic underestimation of rate coefficients. Data analysis based on measured effluent concentration, rather than on secondarily calculated chemical retained, is more versatile and minimizes propagation of errors.


NOTES

Contribution from USDA-ARS, in cooperation with the Pennsylvania Agric. Exp. Stn., The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802.

Received for publication July 6, 1987.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1988 by the Soil Science Society of America.