SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:1040-1045 (1989)
© 1989 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marcano-Martinez, E.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Marcano-Martinez, E.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, M. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Marcano-Martinez, E.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, M. B.

Comparison of the Titration and Ion Adsorption Methods for Surface Charge Measurement in Oxisols

E. Marcano-Martinez and M. B. McBride*

Dep. of Agronomy, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY 14853

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The pH-dependent charge properties of the A and B horizons of two representative oxisols from the Cerrado Region, Brazil, were studied by a comparison of the potentiometric titration method of net charge measurement and direct measurement of anion and cation exchange capacity from K+ and Cl- adsorption. Most soil samples bore net negative charge at their native pH, but variability in the magnitude of this charge was attributed to the effect of Al-blocked exchange sites or contributions from strongly acidic organic functional groups, since these soils had similar mineralogies. The soils also bore significant pH-dependent positive charge at their natural acidic pH values, which was more evident in the B horizons than the surface horizons. Estimates of net surface charge by potentiometric titration and ion adsorption did not agree, especially as the soil pH was adjusted away from the point of zero charge. This lack of agreement is attributed to dissolution reactions of minerals and organic matter at high and low pH, which consume acid or base and overestimate surface charge.


NOTES

Contribution from the Dep. of Agronomy, Cornell Univ. Supported in part by the Tropsoils Project.

Received for publication May 27, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
S. Hyun, L. S. Lee, and P. S. C. Rao
Significance of Anion Exchange in Pentachlorophenol Sorption by Variable-Charge Soils
J. Environ. Qual., May 1, 2003; 32(3): 966 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
N. P. Qafoku and M. E. Sumner
Adsorption and Desorption of Indifferent Ions in Variable Charge Subsoils: The Possible Effect of Particle Interactions on the Counter-Ion Charge Density
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2002; 66(4): 1231 - 1239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
C. Appel and L. Ma
Concentration, pH, and Surface Charge Effects on Cadmium and Lead Sorption in Three Tropical Soils
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2002; 31(2): 581 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the Soil Science Society of America.