SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 53:1733-1736 (1989)
© 1989 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kovar, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kovar, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, S. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kovar, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barber, S. A.

Reasons for Differences among Soils in Placement of Phosphorus for Maximum Predicted Uptake

J. L. Kovar and S. A. Barber*

Dep. of Agronomy, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, IN 47907

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Previous research on placement of phosphate fertilizer has shown that the fraction of the soil fertilized with P affected P uptake by the crop, and that the fraction fertilized for maximum P uptake varied among soils. Placement effects on P uptake have been successfully simulated with a mechanistic uptake model. Values of parameters in the model describing P supply to the root depend on Pli, the initial concentration of P in the soil solution, and Psi, the initial P concentration of the solid phase that rapidly equilibrates with Pli. The objective of this research was to determine the importance of differences among soils in changes in Pli and Psi with increasing rate of P added, on the effect of P placement. Previous research has shown that, as P rate in the fertilized soil increases proportionally with a reduction in the fraction of the soil fertilized, Pli increased curvilinearly and Psi increased linearly. These relations were de-on calculated P uptake with differing P placements was examined rate of P added, a, c and h are constants and d and g are predicted values of initial Pli and Psi, respectively. The effect of varying the coefficients a and c for the Pli function and of h for the Psi function on calculated P uptake with differing P placements was examined in this study. Standard deviations for c and h of 25% of the mean for 33 diverse soils were obtained from previous research. However, these data also showed that log a was correlated negatively with c (r = –0.92). Hence, in a study of curvilinearity of Pli with P added, it was necessary to adjust log a as c was changed. When log a was decreased as c was increased, the fraction of the soil to fertilize for maximum uptake decreased and predicted P uptake with optimum placement increased. When h was increased while holding c and log a constant, there was only a small increase in predicted P uptake and no change in fraction of the soil to fertilize for maximum P uptake. Hence, changes in Pli had a greater effect on predicted P uptake with changes in P placement than changes in Psi.


NOTES

This research was supported in part by a grant from the Fluid Fertilizer Foundation. Contribution of Purdue Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn. Purdue Journal Paper no. 11 847.

Received for publication December 20, 1988.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN BOT (LOND)Home page
M. J. HUTCHINGS and E. A. JOHN
The Effects of Environmental Heterogeneity on Root Growth and Root/Shoot Partitioning
Ann. Bot., July 1, 2004; 94(1): 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1989 by the Soil Science Society of America.