SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:658-664 (1991)
© 1991 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Jaynes, D. B.

Field Study of Bromacil Transport under Continuous-Flood Irrigation

D. B. Jaynes*

National Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The transport processes of sorbing chemicals in field soils are poorly understood. This study characterized the leaching behavior of the weakly sorbing herbicide bromacil (5-bromo-3-sec-butyl-6-methyluracil) in comparison to Br- during continuous-flood irrigation of a small field plot. Twenty-four solution samplers were used to periodically collect in situ samples from seven depths within four 1.83 by 1.83 m subplots. Estimates of the pore water velocity (vs) and dispersion coefficient (D) were made by fitting an analytical solution of the convection-dispersion (CD) equation to the Br- data. Estimates of retardation (R) were made by fitting the CD equation to the bromacil data using the vs and D estimates from the Br- data and letting R be a fitting parameter. Estimates of R were also made from the results of batch equilibration studies using soil from seven depths. Best-fit vs and D values exhibited considerable variability from sampler to sampler (CV = 1.25 and 1.30, respectively) and showed no significant trends with depth. Retardation values estimated from the CD equation averaged 1.88, but varied from 1.21 to 3.35 and also showed no significant trend with depth. In contrast, batch equilibration studies showed the absorption properties of the surface 0.6 m of soil to be significantly different than the 0.6- to 3-m depth, with R values decreasing from 1.62 for the surface 0.6 m to 1.31 at 3 m. Although the two methods gave the same estimate of R in the surface soil, neither the lower R values at deeper depths nor the tendency to decrease with depth as predicted from the batch studies was apparent in the transport data. Using D as an additional fitting parameter to the bromacil data resulted in an average increase of 1.96 for this parameter, indicating more dispersion for the sorbing solute. Increased dispersion and increased tailing of the sorbed solute may be attributed to spatially variable adsorption and to a negative correlation between vs and R (r = –0.524).


NOTES

Contribution from the USDA-ARS National Soil Tilth Lab. and U.S. Water Conservation Lab.

Received for publication July 23, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. Vanderborght and H. Vereecken
Review of Dispersivities for Transport Modeling in Soils
Vadose Zone J., January 24, 2007; 6(1): 29 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. Beigel and L. Di Pietro
Transport of Triticonazole in Homogeneous Soil Columns: Influence of Nonequilibrium Sorption
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 1999; 63(5): 1077 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1991 by the Soil Science Society of America.