HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kennedy, A. C. Articles by Douglas, C. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kennedy, A. C. Articles by Douglas, C. L. Agricola Articles by Kennedy, A. C. Articles by Douglas, C. L.

Rhizobacteria Suppressive to the Weed Downy Brome

USDA-ARS, Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6421

L. F. Elliott

USDA-ARS, Corvallis, OR 97331

C. L. Douglas

USDA-ARS, Columbia Plateau Research Station, Pendleton, OR 97801

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Rhizobacteria have the potential to suppress plant growth. We evaluated the effect of native pseudomonads on downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.), a troublesome weed in small-grain-producing lands. Pseudomonas spp. were isolated from winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and downy brome roots and tested to determine their potential as biological control agents for this weed. Pseudomonads were screened in agar and soil for inhibition of downy brome root growth and lack of inhibition of winter wheat root growth. Of more than 1000 isolates tested, 81 inhibited downy brome and not winter wheat in the agar seedling bioassay. Six isolates consistently inhibited downy brome growth and not winter wheat in soil contained in pots in the growth chamber. In nursery field trials in which downy brome was planted in rows and adequately fertilized, some of the bacterial isolates reduced downy brome populations up to 30% and shoot dry weight up to 42%. Field studies were also conducted at three sites in eastern Washington in which brome-inhibitory bacteria were applied to wheat fields infested with natural populations of downy brome. Of the three isolates studied in the field, two reduced plant populations and aboveground growth of downy brome up to 31 and 53%, respectively, compared with noninoculated controls. At two of the three locations, winter wheat yields were increased 18 to 35% because of the suppression of downy brome growth. Brome-suppressive bacteria isolated from the rhizoplane of winter wheat and downy brome can be used as biological control agents for downy brome.

Contribution no. 8901-51 from the USDA-ARS in cooperation with the Agricultural Research Center, College of Agricultural and Home Economics, Washington State Univ., Pullman.

Received for publication April 30, 1990.