HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sutherland, R. A. Articles by Pennock, D. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sutherland, R. A. Articles by Pennock, D. J. Agricola Articles by Sutherland, R. A. Articles by Pennock, D. J.

Spatial Variability of Nitrogen-15 Natural Abundance

Dep. of Geography, Univ. of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822

C. van Kessel^* and D. J. Pennock

Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada S7N 0W0

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the spatial variability of ¹⁵N natural abundance (¹⁵N) in a non-N₂-fixing plant (Triticum aestivum L.) on two fields. Two center intersecting 50-point perpendicular transects were sampled on two separate fields, on Klassen (Udic Boroll) and Kruger (Typic Boroll) soils in Saskatchewan, Canada. Autocorrelation and semivariograms were used to assess the spatial structure of ¹⁵N. Data from the Klassen field indicated that variation in grain ¹⁵N was random, with no spatial structure at the scale of investigation (2–50 m). The pooled mean grain ¹⁵N value and 95% confidence band was 5.43 ± 0.10, with a coefficient of variation of 8.9%. Observed variability in ¹⁵N was primarily accounted for by analytical error in the Klassen field. The range in ¹⁵N values for Klassen was 2.80, and the maximum difference between samples separated by 2 m was 2.00. These data indicate that, even in a low-variability field, site-to-site variation may be significant. Thus, N₂-fixing plants should be grown in close proximity to the reference crop for quantifying N₂ fixation. Spatial variability in ¹⁵N for the Kruger field was significantly greater than in the Klassen field. Anisotropy was noted in ¹⁵N in the Kruger field, with a pure nugget effect observed for one transect; for the other, a spherical model described the semivariance pattern with a range for spatial dependence of 16 m. The coefficient of variation and the minimum sample size required for estimating ¹⁵N were corrected for the influence of serial correlation. Mean grain ¹⁵N values for the two Kruger transects were 4.45 ± 0.13, and 4.29 ± 0.11. It is hypothesized that the greater variability in grain ¹⁵N in the Kruger field resulted from a shorter lag time between fertilizer-N application and sampling, that is 1.3 yr at Kruger, and 4 yr at Klassen.

Contribution no. R672 of the Saskatchewan Inst. of Pedology.

Received for publication May 18, 1990.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Walley, G. Fu, J.-W. van Groenigen, and C. van Kessel Short-Range Spatial Variability of Nitrogen Fixation by Field-Grown Chickpea Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2001; 65(6): 1717 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]