SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:1543-1545 (1991)
© 1991 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kung, K-J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Donohue, S. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kung, K-J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Donohue, S. V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kung, K-J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Donohue, S. V.

Improved Solute-Sampling Protocol in a Sandy Vadose Zone Using Ground-Penetrating Radar

K-J. S. Kung* and S. V. Donohue

Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Soil solution samples taken from a vadose zone by current monitoring techniques are randomly obtained because it is assumed that the representativeness of the samples is dependent on the total number of samples instead of the location of the samples. In the presence of preferential flow (i.e., "macropore", "fingering", or "funnel" flow), however, the locations as well as the number of samples and not just the number of samples determine the representativeness. The purpose of this study was to: (i) demonstrate that current sampling protocols could underestimate solute breakthrough in a soil with preferential flow; and (ii) show that ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has great potential to nondestructively map the location of interbedded soil layers with textural discontinuities so that suction-cup samplers could be correctly installed along the preferential paths triggered by funnel flow. A 24 by 24 m plot at the Hancock Research Station, Wisconsin, was scanned with GPR in 1989. Based on the GPR images, four ceramic suction-cup samplers were installed at a depth of 1.85 m in locations with layering structures and abrupt textural discontinuities. Four other ceramic suction cup samplers were installed randomly at a depth of 1.5 m. The plot received a uniform pulse of Br solution. Breakthrough curves collected by samplers installed with the aid of GPR have higher concentrations than those collected by randomly installed samplers. This result indicates that random solute sampling in a sandy vadose zone exhibiting preferential flow could underestimate solute movement.


NOTES

Research supported by the UW-Graduate School Research Program and Hatch Project no. 3126.

Received for publication April 5, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
W. Stites and G.J. Kraft
Nitrate and Chloride Loading to Groundwater from an Irrigated North-Central U.S. Sand-Plain Vegetable Field
J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2001; 30(4): 1176 - 1184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1991 by the Soil Science Society of America.