SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:29-36 (1992)
© 1992 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hares, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Novak, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hares, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Novak, M. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hares, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Novak, M. D.

Simulation of Surface Energy Balance and Soil Temperature under Strip Tillage: II. Field Test

Mohammad A. Hares

Land Resource Research Center, Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0C6

Michael D. Novak*

M.D. Novak, Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Suite 248, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4

ABSTRACT

Strip tillage may be a viable management technique for annual crops in northern latitudes, since the mulch strip should conserve soil and water while higher temperatures in the bare strip should yield good germination. The object of our research was to identify the processes that determine surface energy-balance components and soil temperatures under strip tillage and simulate them using a physically based numerical model. We tested the model with micrometeorological data collected at Vancouver, BC. Soil temperatures and evaporation rates in bare and uniformly covered straw-mulch plots were predicted reasonably well, except for the bare plot when evaporation was soil limited. The disagreement was attributed to variability associated with patchy soil drying and inadequacy of the simple surface-resistance model used to calculate evaporation. Good agreement for evaporation rates under 10 and 20 t ha-1 mulches was achieved by enhancing transfer rates within the mulch layers by at least a factor of 4.5 above molecular diffusion rates. For the strip-tillage plots, the model underestimated (energy-limited) evaporation rates and soil temperatures in 0.1-m-wide bare strips separated by 0.3-m-wide mulch strips. This disagreement was attributed to micro-scale advection of warmer and drier air from the mulch strips to the bare strips, a phenomenon neglected in the model (and in all such models in the literature). The measurements showed that springtime soil temperatures in bare strips oriented in various directions were nearly equal to those in an adjacent bare plot. Therefore, considerable erosion protection should be possible without deleterious soil thermal regimes for seed germination.


NOTES

* Corresponding author.

Received for publication August 30, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the Soil Science Society of America.