HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bach, L. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bach, L. B. Agricola Articles by Bach, L. B.

Soil Water Movement in Response to Temperature Gradients: Experimental Measurements and Model Evaluation

U.S. Forest Service Umatilla National Forest, 2517 SW Hailey, Pendleton, OR 97801. Research completed at USDA-ARS Southwest Watershed Research, Tucson, AZ

ABSTRACT

Temperature gradients may have a significant effect on soil water movement under certain conditions, but inclusion of these effects adds complexity to the flow analysis. This study was conducted to help clarify the significance of nonisothermal water flow, and to examine theoretical and numerical descriptions of the transport processes. At initial water contents of 0.00, 0.049, 0.099, 0.151, and 0.282 m³ m^-3, isothermal and nonisothermal laboratory experiments were conducted to provide direct information on soil water movement in response to temperature gradients. These data were used to evaluate the numerical simulation model SPLaSHWaTr2, and to examine calculation of the thermal conductivity, (), the thermal vapor diffusivity, D_Tv(), and the temperature coefficient of the matric potential, C, based on modifications to a theory proposed by Philip and de Vries in 1957. A statistically significant effect of the temperature gradient was found at an initial water content of 0.151 m³ m^-3, which corresponds to a pressure head of approximately -1.2 m of H₂O. No effect of the temperature gradient was found at initial water contents of 0.00, 0.049, 0.099, or 0.282 m³ m^-3. Under isothermal conditions, the model provided simulated water-content profiles that were in good agreement with measured profiles. Under nonisothermal conditions, profiles simulated by the model were in poor agreement with the measured data, using the original values of (), D_Tv(), and C. Sensitivity analysis showed that () and D_Tv() had a negligible influence on nonisothermal water movement. On the other hand, C had a significant influence on nonisothermal water movement. Adjusting C from the original value of -0.0068 K^-1 to the value suggested by Philip and de Vries, -0.00209 K^-1, improved the agreement between simulated and measured water-content profiles, particularly at an initial water content of 0.282 m³ m^-3. With the adjustment in C, the model simulations were in good agreement with the measured data, indicating that the Philip and de Vries theory provides an adequate description of the nonisothermal transport processes.

^* Corresponding author.

Received for publication February 27, 1991.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Zhou, J. L. Heitman, R. Horton, T. Ren, T. E. Ochsner, L. Prunty, R. P. Ewing, and T. J. Sauer Method for Maintaining One-Dimensional Temperature Gradients in Unsaturated, Closed Soil Cells Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 21, 2006; 70(4): 1303 - 1309. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Bachmann, R. Horton, S. A. Grant, and R. R. van der Ploeg Temperature Dependence of Water Retention Curves for Wettable and Water-Repellent Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 44 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]