SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:690-700 (1992)
© 1992 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fayer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fayer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, M. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fayer, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, M. D.

Hydrologic Modeling of Protective Barriers: Comparison of Field Data and Simulation Results

M. J. Fayer*, M. L. Rockhold and M. D. Campbell

Geosciences Dep., Pacific Northwest Lab., P.O. Box 999, Richland, WA 99352

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Protective barriers, which consist of layers of silt loam over sand and gravel, have been proposed as covers for waste sites located in semiarid south-central Washington state. The ability of an uncalibrated model to predict water contents, water storage, and drainage in barriers was tested for durations as long as 1.5 yr. Eight nonvegetated lysimeters containing the barrier layering sequence have been monitored since November 1987. The lysimeters were subjected to one of three precipitation treatments: ambient, 2 x average, and breakthrough (i.e., until drainage occurred). Distributions of measured and simulated water contents with depth were similar; maximum differences ranged from 0.023 cm3/cm3 for the ambient treatment to 0.089 cm3/cm3 near the soil-sand interface for the breakthrough treatment. Simulated storage followed the trend in the measured values, although differences as much as 5 cm were observed at certain times. Generally, the model overpredicted evaporation in the winter and underpredicted it in the summer. Root-mean-square errors were 1.47 and 2.21 cm for the ambient and 2 x -average treatments, respectively. Sensitivity tests revealed that the hydraulic-conductivity function, snow cover, and potential evaporation were important to successful modeling of storage in a protective barrier. When the above parameters and processes were adjusted (though not optimized), the root-mean-square error for the 2 x -average treatment was reduced 63% to 0.81 cm. For the breakthrough treatment, simulated drainage was obtained only by using field-measured sorption and saturated-conductivity data. This result indicates that hysteresis is important to successful modeling of drainage through protective barriers.


NOTES

Prepared for the U.S. Dep. of Energy under Contract DE-AC06-76 RLO 1830.

Received for publication May 7, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
G.W. Gee, C.H. Benson, and W.H. Albright
Comment on "Evaluation of Evapotranspirative Covers for Waste Containment in Arid and Semiarid Regions in the Southwestern USA"
Vadose Zone J., May 26, 2006; 5(2): 809 - 812.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
B. R. Scanlon, R. C. Reedy, K. E. Dwyer, and S. F. Dwyer
Response to "Comments on 'Evaluation of Evapotranspirative Covers for Waste Containment in Arid and Semiarid Regions in the Southwestern USA'"
Vadose Zone J., May 26, 2006; 5(2): 813 - 814.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
M. J. Fayer and G. W. Gee
Multiple-Year Water Balance of Soil Covers in a Semiarid Setting
J. Environ. Qual., January 5, 2006; 35(1): 366 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
G. W. Gee, J. M. Keller, and A. L. Ward
Measurement and Prediction of Deep Drainage from Bare Sediments at a Semiarid Site
Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2005; 4(1): 32 - 40.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
B. R. Scanlon, R. C. Reedy, K. E. Keese, and S. F. Dwyer
Evaluation of Evapotranspirative Covers for Waste Containment in Arid and Semiarid Regions in the Southwestern USA
Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2005; 4(1): 55 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
L. Pan, Y.-S. Wu, and K. Zhang
A Modeling Study of Flow Diversion and Focusing in Unsaturated Fractured Rocks
Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2004; 3(1): 233 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
G. W. Gee, G. W. Gee, Z. F. Zhang, and A. L. Ward
A Modified Vadose Zone Fluxmeter with Solution Collection Capability
Vadose Zone J., November 1, 2003; 2(4): 627 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
G. W. Gee, A. L. Ward, Z. F. Zhang, G. S. Campbell, and J. Mathison
The Influence of Hydraulic Nonequilibrium on Pressure Plate Data
Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2002; 1(1): 172 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the Soil Science Society of America.