SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:807-813 (1992)
© 1992 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clemens, G.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clemens, G.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Clemens, G.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, A.

Ameliorating Chlorosis-Inducing Soils with Rock Materials of Varying Porosity and Iron Content

Gerhard Clemens

Institut für Bodenkunde und Standortslehre, Universität Hohenheim, Postfach 700562, 7000 Stuttgart-70, Germany

Arieh Singer*

Seagram Center for Soil and Water Sciences, The Hebrew Univ. of Jerusalem, Rehovot 76100, Israel

* Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Lime-induced chlorosis is a severe problem, affecting many crops in arid- and semiarid-zone soils. Applications of Fe chelates are expensive and only effective in the short term. The ameliorating effects of rock materials on three chlorosis-producing calcareous soils from Israel were determined in pot tests and in the field. Chlorophyll concentrations of peanut plants (Arachis hypogaea L.) grown in pots with additions of up to 15% (v/v) pumice or tuff-lapilli to the soils were compared with controls and Fe-ethylenediaminedihydrochloric acid (EDDHA) treatments. Additions of 10% (v/v) tuff-lapilli were more effective than those of pumice in small-pot tests of all three soils. Positive effects persisted for a second growth period. In large-pot tests, only 15% (v/v) additions were effective in two soils. In field tests, the three soils were treated with pumice or tuff-lapilli (10% v/v) or basalt powder (5.5% w/w). Basalt powder was the most effective in raising chlorophyll concentrations to levels similar to or greater than those obtained from Fe-EDDHA. Basalt powder was also the most effective in increasing pod and hay yields on two soils. Also, basalt appeared to have long-term effects. Only where chlorosis was not severe and where poor aeration appeared to be an additional factor were the effects of tuff-lapilli and pumice equal or even superior to those of basalt powder. On two soils with severe chlorosis, addition of porous, Fe-poor materials had no effect. Either because the soils were well aerated or because CO2 production was low, CO2 in the soil air was low and not a major factor determining HCO3- in water extracts.

Received for publication March 27, 1990.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the Soil Science Society of America.