SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1042-1050 (1992)
© 1992 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Dam, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Droogers, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by van Dam, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Droogers, P.
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by van Dam, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Droogers, P.

Inverse Method for Determining Soil Hydraulic Functions from One-Step Outflow Experiments

J. C. van Dam*, J. N. M. Stricker and P. Droogers

Contribution from the Dep. of Hydrology, Soil Physics, and Hydraulics, Agricultural Univ., Nieuwe Kanaal 11, 6709 PA, Wageningen, the Netherlands

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Optimization of the parameters describing the soil hydraulic functions {theta}(h) and K(h), in which {theta} is the volumetric water content, h is the soil water pressure head, and K is the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, in a transient-flow experiment is a promising method to derive soil hydraulic information. Laboratory outflow experiments are a typical example. However, estimates from one-step outflow experiments, using only cumulative outflow data in the objective function, are often unreliable and non-unique. Using the MVG model for {theta}(h) and K(h), the sensitivity of parameters to outflow data is shown to depend on their actual values. The one-step outflow method was applied on samples of four soils of different texture. Additionally, the soil hydraulic functions of these soils were measured by alternative, direct methods. From the validation, it appeared that cumulative outflow data have to be supplemented with {theta}(h) data to get reliable estimations.


NOTES

This study was financed by the EC (contract EV4C-0054-NL) as part of the research project Spatial Variability of Land Surface Processes.

Received for publication October 30, 1990.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
J. A. Vrugt, P. H. Stauffer, Th. Wohling, B. A. Robinson, and V. V. Vesselinov
Inverse Modeling of Subsurface Flow and Transport Properties: A Review with New Developments
Vadose Zone J., May 27, 2008; 7(2): 843 - 864.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
J. D. Valiantzas, P. Londra, and A. Sassalou
Explicit Formulae for Soil Water Diffusivity Using the One-Step Outflow Technique
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 28, 2007; 71(6): 1685 - 1693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the Soil Science Society of America.