|
|
||||||||
Dep. of Agricultural Engineering
Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108
*Corresponding author.
ABSTRACT
Gas diffusion is important in determining the aeration status of soils for crop production and in providing estimates of transport of volatile chemicals at waste disposal or chemical spill sites. This study investigated the effects of compaction on the gas diffusion coefficient in four soils. The experiment involved equilibrating bulk loose soil to a known matric potential in a pressure chamber, compressing the equilibrated moist soil in metal cores at a given applied stress, and measuring the concentration of N2 diffusing through these cores into a diffusion chamber. The diffusion coefficient was calculated by fitting an analytical solution of the transient diffusion equation to the measured N2 concentration in the diffusion chamber as a function of time. The diffusion coefficient of N2 in four soils at four water contents and four applied loads varied exponentially as a function of air-filled porosity and was nearly the same function for all four soils. At an air-filled porosity of
10%, the diffusion coefficient was close to zero, reflecting a discontinuity in the pathways at an air-filled pore space of 10% or lower. A model for predicting the diffusion coefficient of gases in soils based on the diffusion coefficient of individual soil constituents was tested with the data set. For known shape factors for soil solid and soil water, the model overpredicted the diffusion coefficient for all four soils. A reduction factor suggested in the literature to account for blocked air slightly improved predictions. The ratio of the measured to predicted diffusion coefficient vs. degree of air-filled saturation suggests a second-degree correction factor to account for blocked air in soils.
Contribution from the Minnesota Agric. Exp. Stn., Scientific Journal Series, Paper no. 19516.
Received for publication October 16, 1991.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Liu, B. Li, K. Hu, and M. Th. van Genuchten Simulating the Gas Diffusion Coefficient in Macropore Network Images: Influence of Soil Pore Morphology Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., June 21, 2006; 70(4): 1252 - 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Shestak and M. D. Busse Compaction Alters Physical but Not Biological Indices of Soil Health Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2005; 69(1): 236 - 246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Teepe, R. Brumme, F. Beese, and B. Ludwig Nitrous Oxide Emission and Methane Consumption Following Compaction of Forest Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2004; 68(2): 605 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Caron and N. V. Nkongolo Assessing Gas Diffusion Coefficients in Growing Media from in situ Water Flow and Storage Measurements Vadose Zone J., February 1, 2004; 3(1): 300 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.D. Startsev and D.H. McNabb Skidder Traffic Effects on Water Retention, Pore-Size Distribution, and van Genuchten Parameters of Boreal Forest Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2001; 65(1): 224 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
P. Moldrup, T. Olesen, J. Gamst, P. Schjønning, T. Yamaguchi, and D.E. Rolston Predicting the Gas Diffusion Coefficient in Repacked Soil: Water-Induced Linear Reduction Model Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2000; 64(5): 1588 - 1594. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Weerts, J. I. Freijer, and W. Bouten Modeling the Gas Diffusion Coefficient in Analogy to Electrical Conductivity Using a Capillary Model Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2000; 64(2): 527 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Agronomy Journal | Crop Science | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Vadose Zone Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||