SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:1876-1880 (1992)
© 1992 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cardon, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Letey, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cardon, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Letey, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cardon, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Letey, J.

Plant Water Uptake Terms Evaluated for Soil Water and Solute Movement Models

G. E. Cardon*

Agronomy Dep., Colorado State Univ., Ft. Collins, CO 80523

J. Letey

Soil and Environmental Sciences Dep., Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Two root water uptake terms, representative of the two major types commonly employed in soil-based models of water and solute movement, were evaluated. Simulations were run to test the sensitivity of the two terms to salinity and water content and to investigate the details of their respective form and function. The two root water uptake terms tested were: (i) a mechanistic equation based on Darcy's law (Type I), and (ii) an empirical equation relating soil water potential to relative water uptake (Type II). The Type I term was insensitive to salinity where no reduction in transpiration was shown for increasing irrigation water salinity from 0.0 to 6.0 dS/m and applying water equal to potential transpiration. The Type II term was sensitive to salinity and showed a 35% reduction in water uptake by increasing water salinity from 0.0 to 6.0 dS m–1 and applying water equal to potential transpiration. Predicted reduction in water uptake due to matric potential was of the same magnitude as that due to salinity. The Type I term resulted in abrupt shifts in water uptake between full and zero transpiration, occasionally resulting in long periods of computed zero transpiration, uncharacteristic of conditions in the field. It was concluded that the Type I water uptake term may not be appropriate for models incorporating root water uptake, particularly under saline conditions.


NOTES

Contribution of the Univ. of California, Riverside. Sponsored by the Univ. of California's Salinity/Drainage Task Force.

Received for publication April 2, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
M. Homaee, R. A. Feddes, and C. Dirksen
A Macroscopic Water Extraction Model for Nonuniform Transient Salinity and Water Stress
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 1764 - 1772.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1992 by the Soil Science Society of America.