HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lentz, R. D. Articles by Shainberg, I. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lentz, R. D. Articles by Shainberg, I. Agricola Articles by Lentz, R. D. Articles by Shainberg, I.

Preventing Irrigation Furrow Erosion with Small Applications of Polymers

USDA-ARS Soil and Water Management Research Unit, 3793 N. 3600 E., Kimberly, ID 83341

I. Shainberg

Institute of Soils and Water, Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, P.O. Box 6, Bet Dagan, Israel

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Soil erosion is a serious problem threatening sustainability of agriculture globally and contaminating surface waters. The objective of this study was to determine whether low concentrations of anionic polymers in irrigation water would appreciably reduce irrigation furrow erosion on Portneuf silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, mesic Durixerollic Calciorthid), a highly erodible soil. Furrow slope was 1.6%, furrow length was 175 m, and irrigation rates ranged from 15 to 23 L min^–1. Inflow during the first 1 to 2 h of the first 8-h irrigation was treated. Subsequent irrigations were untreated. Polyacrylamide (PAM) or starch copolymer solutions were injected into irrigation water entering furrows at concentrations of 0, 5, 10, and 20 g m^–3. Sediment loss from polymer-treated furrows was significantly less than that of control furrows in the first (treated) and second (untreated) irrigations, but not in the fourth (untreated). The PAM provided better erosion control than the starch copolymer. Efficacy of PAM treatments varied depending on its concentration, duration of furrow exposure, and water flow rate. In the initial (treated) irrigation and at low flow rates, 10 g m^–3 PAM reduced mean sediment load by 97% compared with untreated furrows. Residual erosion abatement in a subsequent irrigation, without further addition of PAM, was approximately 50%. The PAM increased net infiltration and promoted greater lateral infiltration. Effective erosion control was achievable for a material cost below $3 ha^–1 irrigation^–1.

Contribution of USDA-ARS Soil and Water Management Research Unit, Kimberly, ID, and USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Lab., West Lafayette, IN.

Received for publication January 31, 1992.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. A. Ajwa and T. J. Trout Polyacrylamide and Water Quality Effects on Infiltration in Sandy Loam Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 27, 2006; 70(2): 643 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lu and L. Wu Polyacrylamide Distribution in Columns of Organic Matter-Removed Soils following Surface Application J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2003; 32(2): 674 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Yu, T. Lei, I. Shainberg, A. I. Mamedov, and G. J. Levy Infiltration and Erosion in Soils Treated with Dry PAM and Gypsum Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2003; 67(2): 630 - 636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lu, L. Wu, J. Letey, and W. J. Farmer Picloram and Napropamide Sorption as Affected by Polymer Addition and Salt Concentration J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2002; 31(4): 1234 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. D. Lentz, R. E. Sojka, and B. E. Mackey Fate and Efficacy of Polyacrylamide Applied in Furrow Irrigation: Full-Advance and Continuous Treatments J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2002; 31(2): 661 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Sirjacobs, I. Shainberg, I. Rapp, and G.J. Levy Flow Interruption Effects on Intake Rate and Rill Erosion in Two Soils Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2001; 65(3): 828 - 834. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Sirjacobs, I. Shainberg, I. Rapp, and G.J. Levy Polyacrylamide, Sediments, and Interrupted Flow Effects on Rill Erosion and Intake Rate Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2000; 64(4): 1487 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text]