HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Johnson, B. N. Articles by Ogg, A. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Johnson, B. N. Articles by Ogg, A. G., Jr. Agricola Articles by Johnson, B. N. Articles by Ogg, A. G.

Suppression of Downy Brome Growth by a Rhizobacterium in Controlled Environments

Land Management and Water Conservation Research Unit

A. G. Ogg, Jr.

Non-Irrigated Agriculture Weed Science Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Pullman, WA 99164-6421

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Plant-suppressive rhizobacteria have the potential to be used as biological control agents to combat weeds. Pseudomonas fluorescens strain D7 (D7) was introduced to downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) seeds to determine the importance of soil water content and temperature on plant suppression in controlled environments. Downy brome seeds were inoculated with a spontaneous rifampicin-resistant mutant of D7 (D7rif) and grown for 14 d at light/dark temperatures ranging from 10/10 to 25/15 °C. In another study, downy brome seeds were inoculated with D7rif in soil at –1.0, –0.1, and –0.03 MPa water pressure. Root colonization by the introduced bacterium was greater at light/dark temperatures of 10/10 °C than at 18/13 and 25/15 °C. Apical root colonization was limited in dry soil. Strain D7rif suppressed downy brome growth in all treatments, but the extent of suppression varied. Greatest suppression occurred in cool (10/10 or 18/13 °C) or moist (–0.03 MPa) conditions. Like many annual weeds, downy brome seeds germinate and establish in the cool, wet autumn; thus, autumn applications of the bacterium may result in a significant biocontrol benefit.

Contribution from the USDA-ARS in cooperation with the College of Agriculture, Washington State Univ. Scientific Paper no. 9101-31.

Received for publication June 28, 1991.