SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:82-87 (1993)
© 1993 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, E.

Prediction of Field Denitrification Rates: A Boundary-Line Approach

J. A. Elliott*

National Hydrology Research Institute, 11 Innovation Boulevard, Saskatoon, SK S7N 3H5, Canada

E. de Jong

Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N 0W0, Canada

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The high degree of spatial and temporal variability in denitrification and the complexity of the controls on the denitrification process make prediction of field denitrification rates difficult. We developed a denitrification model that requires only easily obtainable data to predict daily denitrification rates on Chernozemic soils. The model was developed using boundary-line analysis to establish relationships between soil properties and denitrification for some Saskatchewan soils. Predictions of denitrification are made from water-film thickness (grams of water per unit surface area), air porosity, organic C, NO3, and maximum daily air temperature. The coefficient of determination (R2) for the relationship between predicted and measured denitrification rates was 0.47, with 50% of the predicted denitrification rates falling within the range of the replicates for the corresponding measured rates. When the model was tested using an independent data set, the correlation (R2) between predicted and actual denitrification rates was 0.50 indicating that the model can explain approximately one-half of the variability in denitrification for a range of soils. The model can be combined with a soil water budget to estimate daily denitrification rates from readily available soil and climatic data.


NOTES

Contribution No. R703 of the Saskatchewan Institute of Pedology.

Received for publication November 8, 1991.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1993 by the Soil Science Society of America.