SSSAJ Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:317-323 (1993)
© 1993 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Parkin, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Robinson, J. A.

Statistical Evaluation of Median Estimators for Lognormally Distributed Variables

T. B. Parkin*

USDA-ARS National Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011

J. A. Robinson

7922-190-MR, the Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, MI 49001

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

The increased interest in the variability of soil properties is responsible for recent observations that soil variables are not normally distributed but are more closely approximated by the two-parameter lognormal frequency distribution. Statistical methods commonly applied in the estimation of the median of lognormally distributed data, however, are biased or inefficient. The purpose of this study was to evaluate four statistical methods for estimating, from sample data, the median of a lognormal population. The four statistical methods were: (i) the geometric mean (GM), (ii) a bias-corrected form of the geometric mean (BCGM), (iii) a uniformly minimum variance unbiased (UMVU) estimator, and (iv) the sample median (SM). In addition, two techniques for computing confidence limits about the median were evaluated. Monte Carlo simulations from four different lognormal populations were used in these evaluations to determine the efficacy of these methods as a function of both population variance and sample size (n = 4–100). Results of this work indicate that the UMVU estimator and the BCGM estimators are unbiased and yield estimates with the lowest mean square error. An example is provided that illustrates the application of these techniques.

Received for publication January 31, 1991.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Waste Management ResearchHome page
J.-P. Franzidis, M. Heroux, M. Nastev, and C. Guy
Lateral migration and offsite surface emission of landfill gas at City of Montreal Landfill Site.
Waste Management Research, April 1, 2008; 26(2): 121 - 131.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Vadose Zone Journal Journal of Plant Registrations
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 1993 by the Soil Science Society of America.