HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stolt, M. H. Articles by Simpson, T. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stolt, M. H. Articles by Simpson, T. W. Agricola Articles by Stolt, M. H. Articles by Simpson, T. W.

Soil-Landscape Relationships in Virginia: I. Soil Variability and Parent Material Uniformity

Contribution of the Dep. of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061-0404

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Relationships between soil development and parent material or landscape position can often be hidden or confounded by soil variability. Variability in particle size and elemental composition was examined in soils within four representative toposequences in Virginia. The objectives were to partition total variability, describe lateral variability within horizons of the same pedon, and evaluate parent material uniformity. Total variability was partitioned among study sites, landscape positions, horizons, and random effects. Variability attributed to landscape position was minimal (<8%), suggesting that parent material differences or horizon differentiation may be more important in explaining spatial variability in soils than landscape position. Lateral variability was substantially higher in C horizons, than in associated Bt and near-surface horizons. These differences are related to the weathering and pedogenesis occurring in these horizons resulting in an increase in the degree of order of the soil constituents. Mean coefficients of variation ranged from 8 to 34% for particle size data, and 10 to 30% for elemental data, indicating considerable lateral variability and supporting the need for multiple sampling within horizons. Lithologic discontinuities were difficult to recognize without obvious field evidence. Differences in distributions of clay-free sand and Zr, or ratios of Ti/Zr and sand/silt for residual soils were related to differential weathering rates or slight variations in the parent rock.

Received for publication July 9, 1991.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. I. Stutter, L. K. Deeks, and M. F. Billett Spatial Variability in Soil Ion Exchange Chemistry in a Granitic Upland Catchment Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2004; 68(4): 1304 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. P. Bradley and M. H. Stolt Subaqueous Soil-Landscape Relationships in a Rhode Island Estuary Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2003; 67(5): 1487 - 1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]