SSSAJ Grow Your Career with SSSA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published in Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:782-786 (1993)
© 1993 Soil Science Society of America
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keck, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Quimby, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Keck, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Quimby, W. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Keck, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Quimby, W. F.

Spatial Distribution of Soil Attributes on Reconstructed Minesoils

T. J. Keck* and G. A. Nielsen

Plant and Soil Science Dep.

W. F. Quimby

Mathematics Dep., Montana State Univ., Bozeman, MT 59717

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Mining companies and regulatory agencies need clearly defined methods by which sample data of reconstructed minesoils can be interpolated to determine the spatial distribution and suitability of minesoils for reclamation. Objectives of this study were to model spatial distributions of minesoil attributes across reconstructed landscapes at the Rosebud Mine in southeast Montana, and to evaluate geostatistical procedures that account for spatial dependence in data. Minesoils at the Rosebud Mine have been routinely sampled in an irregular pattern of 100-m sample intervals. The combined replacement depth of topsoil and subsoil material determined the depth of sampling. Topsoil and subsoil materials were analyzed separately for replacement depth, soil texture, soil pH, and electrical conductivity. Minesoil attributes in all cases were spatially independent at the 100-m sample spacing. Four soil attributes, topsoil clay content, topsoil pH, topsoil electrical conductivity, and subsoil replacement depth, were used to described the spatial relationships found in the minesoil data. Application of kriging techniques to interpolate between data points was deemed unnecessary due to the uncorrelated nature of the data and lack of reasonable fit of any semivariograms. Trend surface analysis was used to develop a model that predicts minesoil properties across the site. For topsoil clay content, pH, and electrical conductivity, a constant surface through the overall means was the best predictive model for these properties at the site. A quadratic surface was fit to replacement depth data, which exhibited a trend across the reconstructed landscape. This data set provides an example of how geostatistical techniques can be used to evaluate spatial dependence in data. In the absence of spatial dependence, more traditional satistical techniques that rely on independent data assumptions can be used, such as regression techniques.


NOTES

Contribution of the Montana Agric. Exp. Stn. Journal no. J-2786.

Received for publication May 26, 1992.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Agronomy Journal Crop Science
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1993 by the Soil Science Society of America.