HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Logsdon, S. D. Articles by Jaynes, D. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Logsdon, S. D. Articles by Jaynes, D. B. Agricola Articles by Logsdon, S. D. Articles by Jaynes, D. B.

Methodology for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity with Tension Infiltrometers

USDA-ARS Natl. Soil Tilth Lab., 2150 Pammel Dr., Ames, IA 50011

*Corresponding author.

ABSTRACT

Tension infiltrometers have become a valuable tool for understanding infiltration in macropores and the soil matrix, but methodology varies. Our objective was to compare tension infiltrometer techniques and calculation procedures for determining unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, K(h), as a function of soil water pressure head (h). Field tension infiltrometer measurements were run to determine K(h) from: (i) steady-state infiltration into an excavated one-dimensional column, (ii) calculated sorptivity and measured change in soil water content for steady-state three-dimensional infiltration into dry soil, (iii) steady-state three-dimensional infiltration with two infiltrometer base sizes, and (iv) steady-state infiltration for three negative heads at the same location using two different calculation schemes. For one scheme, a nonlinear regression method was used to fit [a constant relating ln(K) and h] and K(0) from measured infiltration across three negative heads. The fitted and K(0) were then used to calculate K(h) at each negative pressure head. Calculated K(h) by the nonlinear regression method from three-dimensional infiltration measurements were 105% of measured one-dimensional rates (from excavated columns), closer than any other method of calculation. More importantly, this method did not result in calculated K(h) less than zero or larger than three-dimensional infiltration rates, as some calculation procedures did. The method did not depend on determinations of sorptivity or on initial or final soil water content.

Contribution from the USDA-ARS.

Received for publication April 24, 1992.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Walker, H. S. Lin, and D. D. Fritton Is the Tension Beneath a Tension Infiltrometer What We Think It Is? Vadose Zone J., June 21, 2006; 5(3): 860 - 866. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Si and W. Bodhinayake Determining Soil Hydraulic Properties from Tension Infiltrometer Measurements: Fuzzy Regression Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 27, 2005; 69(6): 1922 - 1930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Young, E. V. McDonald, T. G. Caldwell, S. G. Benner, and D. G. Meadows Hydraulic Properties of a Desert Soil Chronosequence in the Mojave Desert, USA Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2004; 3(3): 956 - 963. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Bodhinayake, B. C. Si, and K. Noborio Determination of Hydraulic Properties in Sloping Landscapes from Tension and Double-Ring Infiltrometers Vadose Zone J., August 1, 2004; 3(3): 964 - 970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Bodhinayake, B. C. Si, and C. Xiao New Method for Determining Water-Conducting Macro- and Mesoporosity from Tension Infiltrometer Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2004; 68(3): 760 - 769. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. J. Sauer and S. D. Logsdon Hydraulic and Physical Properties of Stony Soils in a Small Watershed Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2002; 66(6): 1947 - 1956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. C. Schwartz and S. R. Evett Estimating Hydraulic Properties of a Fine-textured Soil Using a Disc Infiltrometer Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2002; 66(5): 1409 - 1423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Logsdon Determination of Preferential Flow Model Parameters Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2002; 66(4): 1095 - 1103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. D. Logsdon, K. E. Keller, and T. B. Moorman Measured and Predicted Solute Leaching from Multiple Undisturbed Soil Columns Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 1, 2002; 66(3): 686 - 695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Al-Jabri, R. Horton, and D. B. Jaynes A Point-Source Method for Rapid Simultaneous Estimation of Soil Hydraulic and Chemical Transport Properties Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 12 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. X. M. Casey and N. E. Derby Improved design for an automated tension infiltrometer Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 64 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.A. Gomez, J.V. Giraldez, and E. Fereres Analysis of Infiltration and Runoff in an Olive Orchard under No-Till Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2001; 65(2): 291 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Bagarello, M. Iovino, and G. Tusa Factors Affecting Measurement of the Near-Saturated Soil Hydraulic Conductivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2000; 64(4): 1203 - 1210. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J.-P. Vandervaere, M. Vauclin, and D. E. Elrick Transient Flow from Tension Infiltrometers: I. The Two-Parameter Equation Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2000; 64(4): 1263 - 1272. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				J.-P. Vandervaere, M. Vauclin, and D. E. Elrick Transient Flow from Tension Infiltrometers: II. Four Methods to Determine Sorptivity and Conductivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2000; 64(4): 1272 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text]